Williams K S, Ochs J, Williams J M, Mulhern R K
MaGee Rehabilitation Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Pediatr Psychol. 1991 Feb;16(1):13-26. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/16.1.13.
Compared ratings of everyday cognitive functioning made by parents of leukemic children to ratings made by parents of normal control and learning disabled (LD) children. The leukemic children had been randomly assigned to one of two CNS prophylaxis treatments, one including cranial irradiation and intrathecal methotrexate and another including only intrathecal methotrexate and intermediate dose infusions of methotrexate. Leukemic children were rated significantly worse than controls in areas related to schooling and academic skills. The type of CNS prophylaxis was not discriminated by parent ratings. LD children were rated as significantly worse than either of the two groups in all areas of cognitive functioning. Leukemic and LD children were both rated as having poor academic skills. Leukemic children missed significantly more school than control and LD children, and their poor ratings on academic skills were partially attributed to academic deprivation. These results suggest that studies should control for academic deprivation when evaluating the neuropsychological outcome of CNS prophylactic treatment and that reintegration and normalization programs should be designed to address the intellectual problems resulting from missed academic experiences.
比较白血病患儿家长对日常认知功能的评分与正常对照儿童和学习障碍(LD)儿童家长的评分。白血病患儿被随机分配到两种中枢神经系统预防治疗方案中的一种,一种包括颅脑照射和鞘内注射甲氨蝶呤,另一种仅包括鞘内注射甲氨蝶呤和中等剂量甲氨蝶呤输注。在与学校教育和学术技能相关的领域,白血病患儿的评分明显低于对照组。家长评分未区分中枢神经系统预防治疗的类型。在所有认知功能领域,LD儿童的评分均明显低于两组中的任何一组。白血病儿童和LD儿童在学术技能方面的评分均较差。白血病患儿缺课明显多于对照组和LD儿童,他们在学术技能方面的低评分部分归因于学业缺失。这些结果表明,在评估中枢神经系统预防性治疗的神经心理学结果时,研究应控制学业缺失因素,并且应设计重新融入和正常化计划,以解决因缺课导致的智力问题。