Department of Pathology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Int J Lab Hematol. 2010 Oct;32(5):512-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2009.01215.x. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
We evaluated the usefulness of RET-Y and RBC-Y in distinguishing functional iron deficiency from iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA) in patients with anaemia of inflammation (AI). Sixty healthy blood donors constituted the control group. We studied RET-Y and RBC-Y in 115 patients with hypochromic/microcytic anaemia. Of these 42 patients had uncomplicated IDA and 73 had AI. The AI patients were further subdivided into AI with IDA and AI with functional IDA based on soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) levels. The mean RBC-Y and RET-Y values in iron-deficient patients were 122.4 and 119.8, respectively, which were significantly lower than the control (P < 0.001). The mean level of RET-Y in patients with AI associated with IDA was 149.3 and this level in AI patients with functional iron deficiency was 147.4. RET-Y levels in both subgroups of AI patients were significantly lower than control but no significant difference was observed between the two subgroups. Similar findings were observed for RBC-Y. Receiver operating characteristic analysis also showed lower specificity for RBC-Y and RET-Y compared with that of sTfR and its log ferritin ratio (F-index). RET-Y and RBC-Y are useful in the diagnosis of simple IDA but have limited utility in the diagnosis of IDA with AI.
我们评估了 RET-Y 和 RBC-Y 在区分炎症性贫血(AI)患者功能性缺铁与缺铁性贫血(IDA)中的作用。60 名健康献血者构成对照组。我们研究了 115 名低色素/小细胞性贫血患者的 RET-Y 和 RBC-Y。其中 42 例为单纯 IDA,73 例为 AI。根据可溶性转铁蛋白受体(sTfR)水平,将 AI 患者进一步分为 AI 合并 IDA 和 AI 合并功能性缺铁。缺铁患者的平均 RBC-Y 和 RET-Y 值分别为 122.4 和 119.8,明显低于对照组(P < 0.001)。IDA 相关 AI 患者的平均 RET-Y 水平为 149.3,功能性缺铁性 AI 患者的 RET-Y 水平为 147.4。两组 AI 患者的 RET-Y 水平均明显低于对照组,但两组间无显著差异。RBC-Y 也观察到类似的结果。受试者工作特征分析还显示,与 sTfR 及其铁蛋白比值(F 指数)相比,RBC-Y 和 RET-Y 的特异性较低。RET-Y 和 RBC-Y 有助于诊断单纯 IDA,但对诊断 AI 合并 IDA 的作用有限。