Centers of Excellence in Environmental Toxicology and Cancer Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084, USA.
Steroids. 2010 Apr;75(4-5):297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
Previous studies have shown that the selection of women who are at high breast cancer risk for treatment with chemoprevention agents leads to an enhanced benefit/risk ratio. However, further efforts to implement this strategy will require the development of new models to predict the breast cancer risk of particular individuals. Postmenopausal women with elevated plasma or serum estrogens are at increased risk for breast cancer. Therefore, the roles of various enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of estrogens in postmenopausal women have been reviewed in detail. In addition, the potential genotoxic and/or proliferative effects of the different estrogen metabolites as risk factors in the etiology of breast cancer have been examined. Unfortunately, much of the current bioanalytical methodology employed for the analysis of plasma and serum estrogens has proved to be problematic. Major advances in risk assessment would be possible if reliable methodology were available to quantify estradiol and its major metabolites in the plasma or serum of postmenopausal women. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with radioimmunoassay (RIA) currently provides the most sensitive and best validated immunoassay method for the analysis of estrone and estradiol in serum samples from postmenopausal women. However, inter-individual differences in specificity observed with many other immunoassays have caused significant problems when interpreting epidemiologic studies of breast cancer. It is almost impossible to overcome the inherent assay problems involved in using RIA-based methodology, particularly for multiple estrogens. For reliable measurements of multiple estrogens in plasma or serum, it will be necessary to employ stable isotope dilution methodology in combination with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Extremely high sensitivity can be obtained with pre-ionized estrogen derivatives when employed in combination with a modern triple quadrupole mass spectrometer and nanoflow LC. Using [(13)C(6)]-estrone as the internal standard it has proved possible to analyze estrone as its pre-ionized Girard T (GT) derivative in sub-fg (low amol) amounts on column. This suggests that in the future it will be possible to routinely conduct LC-MS assays of multiple estrogen metabolites in serum and plasma at even lower concentrations than the current lower limit of quantitation of 0.4pg/mL (1.6pmol/L). The ease with which the pre-ionization derivatization strategy can be implemented will make it possible to readily introduce high sensitivity stable isotope dilution methodology in laboratories that are currently employing LC-MS/MS methodology. This will help conserve important plasma and serum samples as it will be possible to conduct high sensitivity analyses using low sample volumes.
先前的研究表明,为接受化学预防剂治疗而选择处于高乳腺癌风险的女性,可以提高获益/风险比。然而,要进一步实施这一策略,就需要开发新的模型来预测特定个体的乳腺癌风险。绝经后血浆或血清中雌激素水平升高的女性患乳腺癌的风险增加。因此,详细审查了绝经后女性中参与雌激素生物合成的各种酶的作用。此外,还研究了不同雌激素代谢物作为乳腺癌病因学中致癌和/或增殖因素的潜在遗传毒性作用。不幸的是,目前用于分析血浆和血清中雌激素的大部分生物分析方法已被证明存在问题。如果能够获得可靠的方法来定量绝经后妇女血浆或血清中的雌二醇及其主要代谢物,风险评估将取得重大进展。高效液相色谱(HPLC)与放射免疫测定(RIA)相结合,目前为分析绝经后妇女血清样品中的雌酮和雌二醇提供了最敏感和最有效的免疫分析方法。然而,许多其他免疫分析方法观察到的个体间特异性差异,在解释乳腺癌的流行病学研究时造成了严重问题。在解释乳腺癌的流行病学研究时造成了严重问题。在解释乳腺癌的流行病学研究时造成了严重问题。使用基于 RIA 的方法几乎不可能克服固有的测定问题,特别是对于多种雌激素。要可靠地测量血浆或血清中的多种雌激素,有必要结合液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)使用稳定同位素稀释法。当与现代三重四极杆质谱仪和纳流 LC 联用并使用预电离的雌激素衍生物时,可以获得极高的灵敏度。使用[(13)C(6)] - 雌酮作为内标,已经证明可以在柱上分析其预电离的 Girard T(GT)衍生物形式的雌酮,其用量低至亚 fg(低 amol)量。这表明,在未来,有可能以比当前定量下限(0.4pg/mL(1.6pmol/L))更低的浓度常规进行血清和血浆中多种雌激素代谢物的 LC-MS 测定。预离子衍生策略易于实施,这将使当前使用 LC-MS/MS 方法的实验室能够轻松引入高灵敏度稳定同位素稀释方法。这将有助于节省宝贵的血浆和血清样本,因为可以使用低样本量进行高灵敏度分析。