Suppr超能文献

将单核苷酸多态性基因型纳入乳腺癌风险模型的价值。

Value of adding single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes to a breast cancer risk model.

作者信息

Gail Mitchell H

机构信息

Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd, Rm 8032, Bethesda, MD 20892-7244, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jul 1;101(13):959-63. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp130. Epub 2009 Jun 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adding genotypes from seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which had previously been associated with breast cancer, to the National Cancer Institute's Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) increases the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.607 to 0.632.

METHODS

Criteria that are based on four clinical or public health applications were used to compare BCRAT with BCRATplus7, which includes the seven genotypes. Criteria included number of expected life-threatening events for the decision to take tamoxifen, expected decision losses (in units of the loss from giving a mammogram to a woman without detectable breast cancer) for the decision to have a mammogram, rates of risk reclassification, and number of lives saved by risk-based allocation of screening mammography. For all calculations, the following assumptions were made: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, linkage equilibrium across SNPs, additive effects of alleles at each locus, no interactions on the logistic scale among SNPs or with factors in BCRAT, and independence of SNPs from factors in BCRAT.

RESULTS

Improvements in expected numbers of life-threatening events were only 0.07% and 0.81% for deciding whether to take tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer for women aged 50-59 and 40-49 years, respectively. For deciding whether to recommend screening mammograms to women aged 50-54 years, the reduction in expected losses was 0.86% if the ideal breast cancer prevalence threshold for recommending mammography was that of women aged 50-54 years. Cross-classification of risks indicated that some women classified by BCRAT would have different classifications with BCRATplus7, which might be useful if BCRATplus7 was well calibrated. Improvements from BCRATplus7 were small for risk-based allocation of mammograms under costs constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

The gains from BCRATplus7 are small in the applications examined. Models with SNPs, such as BCRATplus7, have not been validated for calibration in independent cohort data. Additional studies are needed to validate a model with SNPs and justify its use.

摘要

背景

将先前与乳腺癌相关的7个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的基因型添加到美国国立癌症研究所的乳腺癌风险评估工具(BCRAT)中,可使受试者工作特征曲线下面积从0.607增加到0.632。

方法

基于四种临床或公共卫生应用的标准用于比较BCRAT和BCRATplus7(包括这7种基因型)。标准包括决定服用他莫昔芬时预期的危及生命事件数量、决定进行乳房X线检查时预期的决策损失(以对未检测出乳腺癌的女性进行乳房X线检查的损失为单位)、风险重新分类率以及通过基于风险的乳房X线筛查分配挽救的生命数量。对于所有计算,做出了以下假设:哈迪-温伯格平衡、SNP之间的连锁平衡、每个位点等位基因的加性效应、SNP之间或与BCRAT中的因素在逻辑尺度上无相互作用,以及SNP与BCRAT中的因素相互独立。

结果

对于50 - 59岁和40 - 49岁女性,决定是否服用他莫昔芬预防乳腺癌时,预期危及生命事件数量的改善分别仅为0.07%和0.81%。对于决定是否向50 - 54岁女性推荐乳房X线筛查,如果推荐乳房X线检查的理想乳腺癌患病率阈值是50 - 54岁女性的阈值,预期损失减少0.86%。风险交叉分类表明,一些被BCRAT分类的女性在BCRATplus7分类中会有所不同,如果BCRATplus7经过良好校准,这可能会有用。在成本限制下,基于风险的乳房X线检查分配中,BCRATplus7的改善很小。

结论

在本研究的应用中,BCRATplus7的收益很小。带有SNP的模型,如BCRATplus7,尚未在独立队列数据中进行校准验证。需要更多研究来验证带有SNP的模型并证明其使用的合理性。

相似文献

6
Twenty-five years of breast cancer risk models and their applications.25年的乳腺癌风险模型及其应用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 26;107(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv042. Print 2015 May.

引用本文的文献

10
What Does "Precision Medicine" Have to Say About Prevention?“精准医学”对预防有何见解?
Epidemiology. 2017 Jul;28(4):479-483. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000667.

本文引用的文献

1
Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction.使用相对效用曲线评估风险预测。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Oct 1;172(4):729-748. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00592.x.
5
Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables.使用风险分层表评估风险预测的价值。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 18;149(10):751-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-10-200811180-00009.
9
On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk.论绝对风险模型的评估标准。
Biostatistics. 2005 Apr;6(2):227-39. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxi005.
10
On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer.论乳腺癌筛查的效果。
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;33(1):43-55. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg275.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验