Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Center for Cancer Training, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7105, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Jan;19(1):292-300. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0643.
Absolute and relative concentrations of estrogens and estrogen metabolites are important for clinical decisions as well as for epidemiologic, experimental, and clinical research on hormonal carcinogenesis. RIA and ELISA are routinely used for measuring estrogen metabolites in blood and urine due to efficiency and low cost. Here, we compare absolute and ranked concentrations of estrone, estradiol, and estriol measured by indirect RIA and of 2-hydroxyestrone and 16alpha-hydroxyestrone measured by ELISA to the concentrations obtained using a novel liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method, which measures 15 estrogen metabolites concurrently. We used overnight urine samples collected from control women (362 premenopausal and 168 postmenopausal) participating in a population-based case-control study of breast cancer among Asian American women ages 20 to 55 years. When comparing RIA or ELISA levels to LC-MS/MS, absolute concentrations for the five estrogen metabolites ranged from 1.6 to 2.9 and 1.4 to 11.8 times higher in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, respectively (all P < 0.0001). However, LC-MS/MS measurements were highly correlated [Spearman r (r(s)) = 0.8-0.9] with RIA and ELISA measurements in premenopausal women and moderately correlated (r(s) = 0.4-0.8) in postmenopausal women. Measurements of the 2-hydroxyestrone:16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio, a putative biomarker of breast cancer risk, were moderately correlated in premenopausal women (r(s) = 0.6-0.7) but only weakly correlated in postmenopausal women (r(s) = 0.2). LC-MS/MS had higher intraclass correlation coefficients (> or =99.6%) and lower coefficients of variation (< or =9.4%) than ELISA (> or =97.2% and < or =14.2%) and RIA (> or =95.2% and < or =17.8%). Comparison with the LC-MS/MS method suggests that the widely used RIA and ELISA estrogen metabolite measures may be problematic, especially at low estrogen metabolite levels characteristic of postmenopausal women.
雌激素及其代谢物的绝对浓度和相对浓度对临床决策以及激素致癌的流行病学、实验和临床研究都很重要。由于效率高和成本低,RIA 和 ELISA 通常用于测量血液和尿液中的雌激素代谢物。在这里,我们将间接 RIA 测量的雌酮、雌二醇和雌三醇的绝对浓度和排序浓度,以及 ELISA 测量的 2-羟基雌酮和 16α-羟基雌酮的浓度,与一种新的液相色谱-串联质谱 (LC-MS/MS) 方法进行比较,该方法同时测量 15 种雌激素代谢物。我们使用了参加亚洲裔美国妇女 20 至 55 岁年龄组乳腺癌的基于人群的病例对照研究的对照组妇女(362 名绝经前和 168 名绝经后)的过夜尿液样本。当将 RIA 或 ELISA 水平与 LC-MS/MS 进行比较时,绝经前和绝经后妇女的五种雌激素代谢物的绝对浓度分别高出 1.6 至 2.9 倍和 1.4 至 11.8 倍(均 P<0.0001)。然而,LC-MS/MS 测量值与绝经前妇女的 RIA 和 ELISA 测量值高度相关 [Spearman r(r(s))=0.8-0.9],与绝经后妇女的中度相关(r(s) = 0.4-0.8)。乳腺癌风险的潜在生物标志物 2-羟基雌酮:16α-羟基雌酮比值的测量值在绝经前妇女中中度相关(r(s) = 0.6-0.7),但在绝经后妇女中仅弱相关(r(s) = 0.2)。LC-MS/MS 的组内相关系数(>或=99.6%)高于 ELISA(>或=97.2%)和 RIA(>或=95.2%),变异系数(<或=9.4%)低于 ELISA(<或=14.2%)和 RIA(<或=17.8%)。与 LC-MS/MS 方法的比较表明,广泛使用的 RIA 和 ELISA 雌激素代谢物测量方法可能存在问题,尤其是在绝经后妇女特有的低雌激素代谢物水平时。