• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依替唑仑 0.5 毫克,每日 2 次治疗对认知功能的影响:一项为期 3 周、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、两治疗、三周期、非劣效性交叉研究,评估焦虑障碍患者。

Effects of treatment with etizolam 0.5 mg BID on cognitive performance: a 3-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-treatment, three-period, noninferiority crossover study in patients with anxiety disorder.

机构信息

Psychiatric Neuroscience Group, Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2009 Dec;31(12):2851-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.12.010.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.12.010
PMID:20110024
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Etizolam is an anxiolytic drug with a pharmacologic profile similar to that of the classic benzodiazepines. Neurochemical research suggests that etizolam may have selectivity for the subpopulation of Y-aminobutyric acid type A receptors associated with anxiety (ie, alpha1, beta2, gamma2). This property, plus its characterization as a ligand with fewer of the adverse events typical of full agonists (impaired cognitive function, tolerance, and dependence), led to its selection for this study.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to test for the noninferiority of etizolam 0.5 mg BID versus placebo in affecting cognitive function in patients with mild to moderate anxiety disorder of recent onset (<1 month). Anxiety measures and tolerability were also assessed.

METHODS

Patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years were eligible for enrollment. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 5 centers in Italy using a 2-treatment, 3-period crossover design. Patients were randomized to 3-week sequences of either etizolam-placebo-placebo or placebo-etizolam-etizolam. They were evaluated at 4 scheduled visits (screening and days 7, 14, and 21). Cognitive function was assessed using scores from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Digit Span test (total forward and backward scores and the time required to perform the test). Anxiety was measured using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for screening and to monitor adequacy of therapy. Blood pressure, heart rate, weight, and adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 77 white patients were enrolled (mean age, 33.3 years [range, 22-60 years]; 62.3% female; mean weight, 65.2 kg). With a power of 0.80, the difference between the effects of etizolam and placebo on WAIS Digit Span performance was not significant for total score (0.102 [90% CI, -0.130 to 0.335]) or time required for completion (0.029 second [90% CI, -0.574 to 0.632]). Anxiety, as measured using the HAM-A and STAI instruments, did not differ significantly between groups. No significant differences were found between etizolam 0.5 mg BID and placebo for cardiovascular events, weight changes, or adverse events. Mild or moderate somnolence was reported by 7 of 77 patients (9.1% [3 patients while receiving etizolam and 4 patients while receiving etizolam and placebo]).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences between etizolam 0.5 mg BID and placebo were found for cognitive function or anxiety measures in these patients with anxiety. Etizolam was well tolerated.

摘要

背景

依替唑仑是一种苯二氮䓬类抗焦虑药物,其药理学特征与经典苯二氮䓬类药物相似。神经化学研究表明,依替唑仑可能对与焦虑相关的γ-氨基丁酸 A 型受体亚群具有选择性(即α 1、β 2、γ 2)。这种特性,加上其作为一种配体的特征,与全激动剂(认知功能损害、耐受性和依赖性)的典型不良事件相比,不良事件更少,这导致了它在本研究中的选择。

目的

本研究的主要目的是测试依替唑仑 0.5mg,每日 2 次(BID)与安慰剂相比,在影响新近发作(<1 个月)的轻度至中度焦虑障碍患者的认知功能方面是否具有非劣效性。还评估了焦虑测量和耐受性。

方法

年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间的患者有资格入组。这是一项在意大利 5 个中心进行的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,采用 2 种治疗、3 期交叉设计。患者随机分为依替唑仑-安慰剂-安慰剂或安慰剂-依替唑仑-依替唑仑 3 周序列。他们在 4 次预定就诊时(筛选和第 7、14 和 21 天)进行评估。认知功能使用威斯康星州成人智力测验(WAIS)数字跨度测验(总分向前和向后得分以及完成测验所需的时间)的分数进行评估。焦虑使用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)进行评估,用于筛查和监测治疗的充分性。还记录了血压、心率、体重和不良事件。

结果

共有 77 名白人患者入组(平均年龄 33.3 岁[范围,22-60 岁];62.3%为女性;平均体重 65.2kg)。在 0.80 的功效下,依替唑仑和安慰剂对 WAIS 数字跨度表现的影响在总分(0.102[90%CI,-0.130 至 0.335])或完成时间(0.029 秒[90%CI,-0.574 至 0.632])方面无显著差异。使用 HAM-A 和 STAI 工具测量的焦虑在组间无显著差异。依替唑仑 0.5mg BID 和安慰剂之间在心血管事件、体重变化或不良事件方面无显著差异。77 名患者中有 7 名(9.1%[3 名接受依替唑仑治疗,4 名接受依替唑仑和安慰剂治疗])报告出现轻度或中度嗜睡。

结论

在这些焦虑患者中,依替唑仑 0.5mg BID 与安慰剂在认知功能或焦虑测量方面未发现有统计学意义的差异。依替唑仑耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Effects of treatment with etizolam 0.5 mg BID on cognitive performance: a 3-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-treatment, three-period, noninferiority crossover study in patients with anxiety disorder.依替唑仑 0.5 毫克,每日 2 次治疗对认知功能的影响:一项为期 3 周、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、两治疗、三周期、非劣效性交叉研究,评估焦虑障碍患者。
Clin Ther. 2009 Dec;31(12):2851-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.12.010.
2
Deramciclane in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-finding study.德洛环烷治疗广泛性焦虑症:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、剂量探索研究。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005 Dec;15(6):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.03.002. Epub 2005 Jun 9.
3
Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (Adderall XR) in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescent patients: a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.混合安非他明盐缓释剂(阿得拉XR)治疗青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效与安全性:一项为期4周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Feb;28(2):266-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.02.011.
4
Gepirone extended-release treatment of anxious depression: evidence from a retrospective subgroup analysis in patients with major depressive disorder.阿吡哌隆缓释剂治疗伴焦虑的抑郁症:来自重度抑郁症患者回顾性亚组分析的证据
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;65(8):1069-75.
5
Desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an 8-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial and a post hoc pooled analysis of three studies.度洛西汀50毫克/天和100毫克/天治疗重度抑郁症:一项为期8周的III期多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照平行组试验及三项研究的事后汇总分析。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31 Pt 1:1405-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.006.
6
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ipsapirone versus lorazepam in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a prospective multicenter trial.一项比较伊沙匹隆与劳拉西泮治疗广泛性焦虑症患者的疗效和安全性的双盲、安慰剂对照研究:一项前瞻性多中心试验。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Dec;13(6):429-37.
7
Effect of valepotriates (valerian extract) in generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot study.缬草提取物中缬草三酯对广泛性焦虑症的影响:一项随机安慰剂对照试验研究
Phytother Res. 2002 Nov;16(7):650-4. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1027.
8
Tiagabine in adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder: results from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies.加巴喷丁用于成人广泛性焦虑症患者:三项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究的结果
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;28(3):308-16. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318172b45f.
9
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:一项安慰剂及帕罗西汀对照试验
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
10
Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of risperidone for acute treatment of bipolar anxiety.利培酮用于双相情感障碍焦虑症急性治疗的随机、安慰剂对照试验
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jun;115(3):376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
2
Etizolam Blood Concentrations in 191 Forensic Cases in Ontario, Canada (2019-2020).加拿大安大略省 191 例法医案例中的艾司唑仑血药浓度(2019-2020 年)。
J Anal Toxicol. 2022 Aug 13;46(7):719-725. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkab106.
3
High-Dose Dependence and Cognitive Side Effects to Medical Prescription of Etizolam.依替唑仑医学处方的高剂量依赖性及认知副作用
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 4;11:601827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.601827. eCollection 2020.
4
Benzodiazepines versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍中苯二氮䓬类药物与安慰剂的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 28;3(3):CD010677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010677.pub2.