Suppr超能文献

通过近红外光谱法评估的前额叶对心算的血流动力学反应中的性别差异。

Sex differences in prefrontal hemodynamic response to mental arithmetic as assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy.

作者信息

Yang Hongyu, Wang Ying, Zhou Zhenyu, Gong Hui, Luo Qingming, Wang Yiwen, Lu Zuhong

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science, Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Gend Med. 2009 Dec;6(4):565-74. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2009.11.003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sex differences in cognitive tasks have been widely investigated. With brain-imaging techniques, the functions of the brain during the performance of tasks can be examined.

OBJECTIVE

Mental arithmetic and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) were used to assess sex differences in prefrontal area activation in a functional brain study.

METHODS

Healthy college students were recruited to perform 2 mental arithmetic tasks. In the first (easy) task, students had to subtract a 1-digit number from a 3-digit number. In the second (difficult) task, they had to subtract a 2-digit number from a 3-digit number. Changes in the concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hgb) in the prefrontal area during the tasks were measured with NIRS.

RESULTS

Thirty students (15 men, 15 women; mean [SD] age: 24.9 [2.2] and 24.3 [2.6] years, respectively) were recruited from Southeast University, Nanjing, China, to participate in the study. The concentration of oxy-Hgb increased during both mental arithmetic tasks (difficult task vs easy task, mean [SD] % arbitrary units: 4.36 [4.38] vs 2.26 [2.82]; F(1,28) = 222.80; P < 0.01). Significant interactions of task x sex (F(1,28) = 82.95), time x sex (F(1,28) = 34.48), task x time (F(1,28) = 222.57), and task x time x sex (F(1,28) = 83.09) were obtained (all, P < 0.01). However, for the 2 tasks, no significant differences between men and women were observed in the mean (SD) response time (men vs women, sec: 3.60 [0.74] vs 3.56 [0.49] for the easy task, 6.55 [0.77] vs 6.44 [0.75] for the difficult task; F(1,28) = 0.67; P = NS) or accuracy rate (men vs women, %: 95.33 [7.40] vs 92.77 [8.80] for the easy task, 62.67 [28.56] vs 54.67 [18.75] for the difficult task; F(1,28) = 0.54; P = NS). Male students showed neural efficiency (less prefrontal activation in subjects with better performance) during the difficult task.

CONCLUSIONS

In these subjects, sex differences in prefrontal response when performing mental arithmetic were associated with the intensity of the task. Compared with men, women had greater efficiency in task performance (ie, less activation or oxygen consumption for equal performance).

摘要

背景

认知任务中的性别差异已得到广泛研究。借助脑成像技术,可以检查任务执行过程中大脑的功能。

目的

在一项功能性脑研究中,运用心算和近红外光谱(NIRS)来评估前额叶区域激活的性别差异。

方法

招募健康大学生执行两项心算任务。在第一项(简单)任务中,学生要从一个三位数中减去一个一位数。在第二项(困难)任务中,他们要从一个三位数中减去一个两位数。任务执行过程中,用NIRS测量前额叶区域氧合血红蛋白(oxy-Hgb)浓度的变化。

结果

从中国南京的东南大学招募了30名学生(15名男性,15名女性;平均[标准差]年龄分别为24.9[2.2]岁和24.3[2.6]岁)参与研究。两项心算任务期间,oxy-Hgb浓度均升高(困难任务与简单任务相比,平均[标准差]任意单位百分比:4.36[4.38]对2.26[2.82];F(1,28)=222.80;P<0.01)。获得了任务×性别(F(1,28)=82.95)、时间×性别(F(1,28)=34.48)、任务×时间(F(1,28)=222.57)和任务×时间×性别(F(1,28)=83.09)的显著交互作用(均P<0.01)。然而,对于这两项任务,男性和女性在平均(标准差)反应时间(男性对女性,秒:简单任务为3.60[0.74]对3.56[0.49],困难任务为6.55[0.77]对6.44[0.75];F(1,28)=0.67;P=无统计学意义)或准确率(男性对女性,%:简单任务为95.33[7.40]对92.77[8.80],困难任务为62.67[28.56]对54.67[18.75];F(1,28)=0.54;P=无统计学意义)上未观察到显著差异。在困难任务中,男学生表现出神经效率(表现较好的受试者前额叶激活较少)。

结论

在这些受试者中,心算时前额叶反应的性别差异与任务强度有关。与男性相比,女性在任务执行中效率更高(即同等表现下激活或氧消耗更少)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验