• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用真空敷贴器对前臂供区进行处理的随机、前瞻性、对照研究

A randomized, prospective, controlled study of forearm donor site healing when using a vacuum dressing.

机构信息

OSU Eye and Ear Institute, 915 Olentangy River Rd, Ste 4000, Columbus, OH 43212, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Feb;142(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.11.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.11.003
PMID:20115970
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

  1. Compare skin graft healing of the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site when using a negative pressure dressing (NPD) versus a static pressure dressing (SPD). 2) Examine the association of graft size and medical comorbidities with healing of RFFF donor site.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

After the study was approved, consenting adults undergoing RFFF for head and neck reconstructions were randomized into two arms: SPD and NPD groups. Fifty-four patients were enrolled from March 2007 to August 2009. Pre- and postoperative data were collected, including medical comorbidities, graft size, and area of graft failure/tendon exposure. Data were collected at two postoperative time points.

RESULTS

The overall wound complication rate was 38 percent (19/50). Wound complications at the first postoperative visit (44.4% [12/27] SPD and 30.4% [7/23] NPD) were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.816). Similarly, wound complications at the second visit (68.8% [11/16] SPD and 80% [12/15] NPD) were not significantly different (P = 0.55). Percentage of area of graft failure between the groups also showed no difference (4.5% SPD vs 7.2% NPD, P = 0.361). The association of graft size with wound complications was analyzed by dividing the data set into three groups (<50 cm(2), 51-100 cm(2), and >100 cm(2)). This difference was not found to be significant (P = 0.428). Finally, when evaluating comorbidities, 50 percent (8/16) of subjects with comorbidities experienced complications compared with 32.4 percent (11/34) without comorbidities, also not reaching significance (P = 0.203).

CONCLUSIONS

Although an attractive option for wound care, the NPD does not appear to offer a significant improvement over an SPD in healing of the RFFF donor site.

摘要

目的

1)比较使用负压敷料(NPD)与静态压力敷料(SPD)时桡侧前臂游离皮瓣(RFFF)供区的植皮愈合情况。2)研究移植物大小和合并症与 RFFF 供区愈合的关系。

研究设计

随机对照试验。

设置

三级保健医院。

受试者和方法

在研究获得批准后,同意接受 RFFF 进行头颈部重建的成年人被随机分为两组:SPD 和 NPD 组。2007 年 3 月至 2009 年 8 月共纳入 54 例患者。收集术前和术后数据,包括合并症、移植物大小和移植物失败/肌腱暴露面积。在两个术后时间点收集数据。

结果

总伤口并发症发生率为 38%(19/50)。首次术后就诊时的伤口并发症(SPD 组 44.4%[12/27],NPD 组 30.4%[7/23])在两组之间无显著差异(P=0.816)。同样,第二次就诊时的伤口并发症(SPD 组 68.8%[11/16],NPD 组 80%[12/15])也无显著差异(P=0.55)。两组间移植物失败面积百分比也无差异(SPD 组 4.5%,NPD 组 7.2%,P=0.361)。通过将数据集分为三组(<50cm2、51-100cm2 和>100cm2)来分析移植物大小与伤口并发症的关系,差异无统计学意义(P=0.428)。最后,在评估合并症时,50%(8/16)的合并症患者发生并发症,而无合并症患者的这一比例为 32.4%(11/34),差异也无统计学意义(P=0.203)。

结论

尽管负压敷料是一种有吸引力的伤口护理选择,但与 SPD 相比,它似乎并没有显著改善 RFFF 供区的愈合。

相似文献

1
A randomized, prospective, controlled study of forearm donor site healing when using a vacuum dressing.采用真空敷贴器对前臂供区进行处理的随机、前瞻性、对照研究
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Feb;142(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.11.003.
2
Management of the radial forearm free flap donor site with the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system.采用负压封闭引流(VAC)系统管理桡侧前臂游离皮瓣供区。
Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1918-22. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000235935.07261.98.
3
Negative pressure wound dressing of the radial forearm donor site.桡侧前臂供区的负压伤口敷料
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Jun;29(3):198-200.
4
Incidence of donor site skin graft loss requiring surgical intervention with the radial forearm free flap.采用桡侧前臂游离皮瓣进行手术干预时供区皮肤移植失败的发生率。
Head Neck. 2007 Jun;29(6):573-6. doi: 10.1002/hed.20584.
5
A comparison of negative-pressure dressings versus Bolster and splinting of the radial forearm donor site.负压敷料与前臂桡侧供区支撑及夹板固定的比较。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Sep;133(3):403-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.04.028.
6
Prospective evaluation of a negative pressure dressing system in the management of the fibula free flap donor site: a comparative analysis.前瞻性评估负压引流敷料系统在腓骨游离皮瓣供区创面管理中的应用:一项对比分析。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Oct;139(10):1048-53. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4544.
7
Donor site morbidity following radial forearm free flap reconstruction with split thickness skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy.游离前臂皮瓣重建术后使用负压伤口治疗技术行断层皮片移植供区并发症。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May 21;48(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0344-9.
8
Full-thickness skin graft from the groin for coverage of the radial forearm free flap donor site.取自腹股沟的全厚皮片用于覆盖桡侧前臂游离皮瓣供区。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2007 Sep-Oct;28(5):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.10.009.
9
Repair of the radial free flap donor site with full or partial thickness skin grafts. A prospective randomised controlled trial.采用全厚或中厚皮片修复桡侧游离皮瓣供区。一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Jun;29(3):194-7.
10
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure dressing and conventional dressing methods on split-thickness skin grafts in burned patients.一项比较负压敷料和常规敷料方法对烧伤患者进行刃厚皮片移植的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Burns. 2011 Sep;37(6):925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Donor Site Morbidity and Flap Perfusion Following Radial versus Ulnar Forearm Free Flap-A Randomized Controlled Prospective Clinical Trial.桡侧与尺侧前臂游离皮瓣术后供区长期并发症及皮瓣灌注情况——一项随机对照前瞻性临床试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 22;11(13):3601. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133601.
2
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.
3
Negative-pressure wound therapy for donor-site closure in radial forearm free flap: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
负压伤口疗法在游离桡侧前臂皮瓣供区创面关闭中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2022 Feb;19(2):316-325. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13632. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
4
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口治疗用于通过一期缝合愈合的手术伤口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 15;6(6):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub6.
5
Potential molecular mechanisms of negative pressure in promoting wound healing.负压促进伤口愈合的潜在分子机制。
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1428-1438. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13423. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
6
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口治疗用于通过一期缝合愈合的手术伤口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 1;5(5):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub5.
7
Pilot Study to Assess Safety and Usability of the Kyron NPWT System.评估凯龙负压伤口治疗系统安全性和易用性的初步研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Aug 12;7(8):e2334. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002334. eCollection 2019 Aug.
8
Donor site morbidity following radial forearm free flap reconstruction with split thickness skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy.游离前臂皮瓣重建术后使用负压伤口治疗技术行断层皮片移植供区并发症。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May 21;48(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0344-9.
9
Negative pressure wound therapy as a definitive treatment for upper extremity wound defects: A systematic review.负压伤口疗法作为治疗上肢创伤缺损的确定性治疗方法:系统评价。
Int Wound J. 2019 Aug;16(4):960-967. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13128. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口治疗用于通过一期缝合愈合的手术伤口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 26;3(3):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub4.