• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预措施以提高医疗保健提供者对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的建议和实施率:提供者提醒的系统评价。

Intervention to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers a systematic review of provider reminders.

机构信息

Community Guide Branch, National Center for Health Marketing, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.031.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.031
PMID:20117566
Abstract

Most major medical organizations recommend routine screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Screening can lead to early detection of these cancers, resulting in reduced mortality. Yet, not all people who should be screened are screened regularly or, in some cases, ever. This report presents results of systematic reviews of effectiveness, applicability, economic efficiency, barriers to implementation, and other harms or benefits of provider reminder/recall interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. These interventions involve using systems to inform healthcare providers when individual clients are due (reminder) or overdue (recall) for specific cancer screening tests. Evidence in this review of studies published from 1986 through 2004 indicates that reminder/recall systems can effectively increase screening with mammography, Pap, fecal occult blood tests, and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Additional research is needed to determine if provider reminder/recall systems are effective in increasing colorectal cancer screening by colonoscopy. Specific areas for further research are also suggested.

摘要

大多数主要医学组织建议对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌进行常规筛查。筛查可以早期发现这些癌症,从而降低死亡率。然而,并非所有应接受筛查的人都定期接受筛查,或者在某些情况下从未接受过筛查。本报告介绍了对提供者提醒/召回干预措施以增加乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的有效性、适用性、经济效率、实施障碍以及其他危害或益处进行系统评价的结果。这些干预措施涉及使用系统在个人客户应进行(提醒)或过期(召回)特定癌症筛查测试时通知医疗保健提供者。对 1986 年至 2004 年发表的研究进行的这项审查中的证据表明,提醒/召回系统可以有效地增加乳房 X 光检查、巴氏涂片、粪便潜血试验和乙状结肠镜检查的筛查。需要进一步研究以确定提供者提醒/召回系统是否可以通过结肠镜检查有效增加结直肠癌的筛查。还建议了进一步研究的具体领域。

相似文献

1
Intervention to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers a systematic review of provider reminders.干预措施以提高医疗保健提供者对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的建议和实施率:提供者提醒的系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.031.
2
Client-directed interventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.以客户为导向的干预措施,以增加社区获得乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的机会:一项系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.001.
3
Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.以客户为导向的干预措施以提高社区对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的需求:一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S34-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.002.
4
Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline.促进乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的有效干预措施:实施指南。
Implement Sci. 2011 Sep 29;6:112. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-112.
5
Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult.使用粪便潜血试验(Hemoccult)筛查结直肠癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.
6
Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈癌教育及医疗服务提供者的筛查建议对筛查率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0183924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183924. eCollection 2017.
7
Cascade colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a global conceptual model.级联结直肠癌筛查指南:一个全球概念模型。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;45(4):297-300. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182098e07.
8
[Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].[卫生技术评估报告。液基细胞学在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33.
9
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Cancer Screening among African Immigrants in the United States: An Integrative Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Interventions.美国非洲移民中的乳腺癌筛查:障碍、促进因素和干预措施的综合回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 30;21(8):1004. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081004.
2
Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program.基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查的核心能力和循证干预措施的可持续性研究:加利福尼亚州结直肠癌控制计划。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241255218. doi: 10.1177/10732748241255218.
3
Barriers to and opportunities for advancing racial equity in cervical cancer screening in the United States.
推进美国宫颈癌筛查中种族公平的障碍和机遇。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03151-7.
4
A Scoping Literature Review on Evidence-Based Strategies to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening.基于证据的增加宫颈癌筛查策略的范围文献综述
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231220994. doi: 10.1177/21501319231220994.
5
When should electronic medical records reminders for cancer screening stop?-Results from a national physician survey.电子病历癌症筛查提醒何时应该停止?——一项全国医师调查的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Sep;71(9):2878-2885. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18412. Epub 2023 May 24.
6
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Letter and Telephone Reminders in Promoting the Use of Specific Health Guidance in an At-Risk Population for Metabolic Syndrome in Japan: A Randomized Controlled Trial.评估信函和电话提醒在促进日本代谢综合征高危人群使用特定健康指导方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3784. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053784.
7
Clinical follow-up practices after cervical cancer screening by co-testing: A population-based study of adherence to U.S. guideline recommendations.人乳头瘤病毒联合检测后宫颈癌筛查的临床随诊实践:一项基于人群的美国指南推荐依从性研究。
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106770. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106770. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
8
Barriers to utilization of three colorectal cancer screening options - Data from a national survey.三种结直肠癌筛查方法的使用障碍——来自一项全国性调查的数据
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jul 29;24:101508. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101508. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Acceptability, Utility, and Cost of a Mobile Health Cancer Screening Education Application for Training Primary Care Physicians in India.移动医疗癌症筛查教育应用在培训印度初级保健医生方面的可接受性、实用性和成本。
Oncologist. 2021 Dec;26(12):e2192-e2199. doi: 10.1002/onco.13904. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
10
Social-life factors associated with participation in screening and further assessment of colorectal cancer: A nationwide ecological study in Japanese municipalities.与参与结直肠癌筛查及进一步评估相关的社会生活因素:日本各市政当局的一项全国性生态研究
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Jun 8;15:100839. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100839. eCollection 2021 Sep.