• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查的核心能力和循证干预措施的可持续性研究:加利福尼亚州结直肠癌控制计划。

Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program.

机构信息

California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.

American Cancer Society, Sacramento, CA, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241255218. doi: 10.1177/10732748241255218.

DOI:10.1177/10732748241255218
PMID:39058902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11282556/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined the extent to which funded satellite clinics could sustain the California Colon Cancer Control Program (C4P) strategies implemented in health systems to increase uptake of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the absence of future C4P funds.

INTRODUCTION

Seven health systems consisting of 38 satellite clinics participated in C4P to examine the sustainability of the program in the absence future Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding.

METHODS

Quantitative and qualitative methods with a close and open-ended survey approach, and a prospective cohort design were used to examine the sustainability of the C4P in health systems.

RESULTS

A total of 61% of satellite clinics could not sustain funding stability. Only 26% could sustain funding stability. About, 71%, 26%, and 21% of the satellite clinics could sustain the small media platform, patient navigation services, and community health workers (CHWs), respectively. All the satellite clinics sustained the provider reminder system and professional development. Roughly, 71% and 42% of funded satellite clinics could not sustain the patient navigators and CHWs, respectively. The satellite clinics that could sustain funding stability, sustained patient navigation services and CHWs. Health systems that could not sustain funding stability, could not sustain patient navigation services and CHWs. Qualitatively, the need to support uninsured priority populations, health educators, patient navigators, care coordination activities, outreach services, and provision of enhanced services emerged. The need to support enhanced quality measures, expansion of funding, Medi-Cal Public Hospital Redesign and Incentive coverage, health plan, community linkages, resource sharing, and best practices specifically on CRC screening emerged. Themes such as automated reminder, limited personalized care delivery and capacity, transportation barriers, staff salary, expansion of care through patient navigation, and culturally appropriate media campaign also emerged.

CONCLUSION

Overall, to address sustainability barriers, funding stability should be maintained in the health systems.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在没有未来加州结直肠癌控制项目(C4P)基金的情况下,资金支持的卫星诊所能够在多大程度上维持 C4P 项目在卫生系统中实施的策略,以提高粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)或免疫化学粪便潜血试验(iFOBT)用于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的采用率。

简介

由 38 家卫星诊所组成的 7 个卫生系统参与了 C4P,以检验在没有未来疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)资金的情况下该项目的可持续性。

方法

采用定量和定性方法,采用封闭式和开放式调查方法以及前瞻性队列设计,以检验 C4P 在卫生系统中的可持续性。

结果

共有 61%的卫星诊所无法维持资金稳定,只有 26%的诊所能够维持资金稳定。大约 71%、26%和 21%的卫星诊所能够分别维持小型媒体平台、患者导航服务和社区卫生工作者(CHW)。所有的卫星诊所都维持了提供提醒服务和专业发展。大约 71%和 42%的资金支持卫星诊所分别无法维持患者导航员和 CHW。能够维持资金稳定的卫星诊所维持了患者导航服务和 CHW。无法维持资金稳定的卫生系统无法维持患者导航服务和 CHW。定性研究结果表明,需要支持没有保险的优先人群、健康教育者、患者导航员、护理协调活动、外展服务以及提供增强服务。需要支持增强质量措施、扩大资金覆盖范围、加州公共医院重新设计和激励计划、医疗保健计划、社区联系、资源共享以及特别针对 CRC 筛查的最佳实践。还出现了一些主题,如自动提醒、个性化护理提供能力有限、交通障碍、员工工资、通过患者导航扩大护理范围以及文化适宜的媒体宣传。

结论

总体而言,为了解决可持续性障碍,应在卫生系统中维持资金稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c23e/11282556/b6998b574f69/10.1177_10732748241255218-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c23e/11282556/b3aecdb2bf30/10.1177_10732748241255218-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c23e/11282556/b6998b574f69/10.1177_10732748241255218-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c23e/11282556/b3aecdb2bf30/10.1177_10732748241255218-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c23e/11282556/b6998b574f69/10.1177_10732748241255218-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program.基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查的核心能力和循证干预措施的可持续性研究:加利福尼亚州结直肠癌控制计划。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241255218. doi: 10.1177/10732748241255218.
2
Implementing Mailed Colorectal Cancer Fecal Screening Tests in Real-World Primary Care Settings: Promising Implementation Practices and Opportunities for Improvement.在真实初级保健环境中实施邮寄结直肠癌粪便筛查检测:有前景的实施实践和改进机会。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):124-135. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01496-3. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
3
Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.华盛顿州联邦合格健康中心实施的多层结直肠癌筛查推广干预措施的效果和成本。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4121-4129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31693. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
4
Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验进行结直肠癌筛查:疾病预防控制中心主办的峰会总结。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):283-298. doi: 10.3322/caac.21615. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
Evaluating Uptake of Evidence-Based Interventions in 355 Clinics Partnering With the Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2015-2018.评估 2015-2018 年与结直肠癌控制计划合作的 355 家诊所对循证干预措施的采用情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 May 19;19:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210258.
6
A Survey of Provider Attitudes, Beliefs, and Perceived Barriers Regarding a Centralized Direct-Mail Colorectal Cancer Screening Approach at Community Health Centers.社区卫生中心关于集中式直邮结直肠癌筛查方法的提供者态度、信念及感知障碍的调查
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719890950. doi: 10.1177/2150132719890950.
7
What makes for successful patient navigation implementation in cancer prevention and screening programs using an evaluation and sustainability framework.利用评估和可持续性框架,在癌症预防和筛查计划中实现成功的患者导航实施的因素是什么。
Cancer. 2022 Jul 1;128 Suppl 13:2636-2648. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34058.
8
Barriers and proposed solutions to at-home colorectal cancer screening tests in medically underserved health centers across three US regions to inform a randomized trial.在美国三个地区的医疗服务不足的健康中心进行家庭结直肠癌筛查检测的障碍和建议解决方案,为一项随机试验提供信息。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(15):e70040. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70040.
9
Improving Fecal Immunochemical Test Return Rates: A Colorectal Cancer Screening Quality Improvement Project in a Multisite Federally Qualified Health Center.提高粪便免疫化学检测(Fecal Immunochemical Test,FIT)的回检率:在一个多地点联邦合格健康中心开展的结直肠癌筛查质量改进项目。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):740-754. doi: 10.1177/15248399221083294. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
10
Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center.考察医疗服务提供者激励措施在社区医疗中提高结直肠癌筛查接受率的有效性:以加利福尼亚州一家联邦合格健康中心为例
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):898-904. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954166. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Co-Design of an Evidence-Based Health Education Strategy to Improve Bowel Cancer Awareness and Screening in a Remote Tasmanian Community: Lessons Learned.共同设计基于证据的健康教育策略以提高塔斯马尼亚偏远社区对肠癌的认知和筛查:经验教训
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70052. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70052.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2022 Jun;36(3):393-414. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
2
Precision Patient Navigation to Improve Rates of Follow-up Colonoscopy, An Individual Randomized Effectiveness Trial.精准患者导航以提高结肠镜随访率:一项个体随机有效性试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Dec;30(12):2327-2333. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1793. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
3
Risk of colorectal cancer in first degree relatives of patients with colorectal polyps: nationwide case-control study in Sweden.
结直肠息肉患者一级亲属的结直肠癌风险:瑞典全国病例对照研究。
BMJ. 2021 May 4;373:n877. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n877.
4
Promoting colorectal cancer screening: A scoping review of screening interventions and resources.促进结直肠癌筛查:筛查干预措施和资源的范围综述。
Prev Med. 2021 Jun;147:106517. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106517. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review.转移性结直肠癌的诊断与治疗:综述
JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):669-685. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0106.
6
A comparison of methods in estimating population attributable risk for colorectal cancer in the United States.美国结直肠癌人群归因危险度估计方法的比较。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Jun 15;148(12):2947-2953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33489. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia.西弗吉尼亚州农村联邦合格健康中心促进结直肠癌筛查的提醒措施的成本与效果
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):891-897. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954164. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
8
Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center.考察医疗服务提供者激励措施在社区医疗中提高结直肠癌筛查接受率的有效性:以加利福尼亚州一家联邦合格健康中心为例
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):898-904. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954166. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Whole grain and dietary fiber intake and risk of colorectal cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort.全谷物和膳食纤维摄入与 NIH-AARP 饮食与健康研究队列中结直肠癌风险的关系。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Sep 1;112(3):603-612. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa161.
10
Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验进行结直肠癌筛查:疾病预防控制中心主办的峰会总结。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):283-298. doi: 10.3322/caac.21615. Epub 2020 Jun 25.