• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜与开放式腕管松解术。

Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2010 Jan;26(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.027. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.027
PMID:20117624
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study compared endoscopic carpal tunnel release with the conventional open technique with respect to short- and long-term improvements in functional and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We assessed 72 outpatients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. Of these patients, 37 underwent the endoscopic method according to Chow and 35 were assigned to the open method. Improvement in symptoms, severity, and functionality were evaluated at 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 year postoperatively. Changes in clinical outcomes were evaluated at 1 year postoperatively. Complications were also assessed.

RESULTS

Both groups showed similar improvement in all but 1 outcome 1 year after the release; increase in grip strength was significantly higher in the endoscopic group. However, the endoscopic method showed a greater improvement in symptoms and functional status compared with the open method at 2 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks postoperatively. Separate analysis of the questions referring to pain showed that the delay in improvement in the open group was because of the persistence of pain for a longer period. Paresthesias and numbness decrease immediately after the operation with comparable rates for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release provides a faster recovery to operated patients for the first 2 weeks, with faster relief of pain and faster improvement in functional abilities. Paresthesia and numbness subside in an identical manner with the 2 techniques. At 1 year postoperatively, both open and endoscopic techniques seem to be equivalently efficient.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了内窥镜下腕管松解术与传统开放式手术在改善功能和临床结果方面的短期和长期效果。

方法

我们评估了 72 例被诊断为腕管综合征的门诊患者。其中 37 例患者采用 Chow 内镜方法,35 例患者采用开放式方法。在术后 2 天、1 周、2 周和 1 年评估症状、严重程度和功能的改善情况。术后 1 年评估临床结果的变化。还评估了并发症。

结果

两组患者在除 1 项结果外,其余所有结果在释放后 1 年均有类似的改善;握力增加在内窥镜组显著更高。然而,与开放式方法相比,内窥镜方法在术后 2 天、1 周和 2 周时在症状和功能状态方面有更大的改善。对疼痛相关问题的单独分析表明,开放式组的改善延迟是由于疼痛持续时间更长。术后即刻两组的麻木和感觉异常均减轻,且减轻程度相似。

结论

内窥镜下腕管松解术为手术患者在最初的 2 周内提供更快的恢复,更快缓解疼痛和更快改善功能能力。两种技术的麻木和感觉异常减轻情况相同。术后 1 年,开放式和内窥镜技术似乎同样有效。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release.内镜与开放式腕管松解术。
Arthroscopy. 2010 Jan;26(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.027. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
2
Minimally invasive carpal tunnel decompression using the KnifeLight.使用KnifeLight进行微创腕管减压术。
Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS162-8; discussion ONS168-9. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249249.33052.7E.
3
Comparison of the results of open carpal tunnel release and KnifeLight carpal tunnel release.开放性腕管松解术与KnifeLight腕管松解术结果的比较。
Singapore Med J. 2007 Dec;48(12):1131-5.
4
Open compared with 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.开放性手术与双门内镜下腕管松解术的比较:一项随机对照试验的5年随访
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Feb;34(2):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.10.026.
5
Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized trial.内镜下与开放性腕管松解术:一项随机试验。
J Hand Surg Am. 2003 May;28(3):475-80. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2003.50080.
6
Dual-portal endoscopic release of the transverse ligament in carpal tunnel syndrome: results of 411 procedures with special reference to technique, efficacy, and complications.双入路内镜下松解腕横韧带治疗腕管综合征:411例手术的结果,特别关注技术、疗效及并发症
Neurosurgery. 2006 Aug;59(2):333-40; discussion 333-40. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000223500.25131.99.
7
Endoscopic carpal tunnel release using a new median nerve protector.使用新型正中神经保护器的内镜下腕管松解术。
Arthroscopy. 2004 Oct;20(8):841-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.06.031.
8
Clinical outcomes of surgical release among diabetic patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: prospective follow-up with matched controls.糖尿病性腕管综合征患者手术松解的临床结局:与匹配对照组的前瞻性随访
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Sep;34(7):1177-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
9
[Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: endoscopic or classical (open)? A prospective randomized trial].[腕管综合征的手术治疗:内镜手术还是传统(开放)手术?一项前瞻性随机试验]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 May 3;141(18):878-82.
10
A randomized controlled trial of surgery vs steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome.一项关于手术与类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征的随机对照试验。
Neurology. 2005 Jun 28;64(12):2074-8. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000169017.79374.93.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic Release of the Carpal Ligament: A Sheathless Tube Technique for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.腕管韧带的内镜下松解:一种用于腕管综合征的无鞘管技术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2025 Jun 13;14(7):103626. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103626. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Time to recovery following open and endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression: meta-analysis.开放性和内镜下腕管减压术后的恢复时间:荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf085.
3
Comparing the Efficacy of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Repair Versus Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.
比较内镜下腕管修复术与开放手术的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jun 23;13(6):e6887. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006887. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Carpal Tunnel Release With Ultrasound Guidance: Intermediate-Term Clinical Outcomes and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.超声引导下腕管松解术:中期临床结果及磁共振成像表现
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Jun 7;5(5):595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.05.002. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Management of common conditions of the musician: a narrative review for plastic surgeons.常见音乐家相关状况的处理:整形外科医师的叙事性文献回顾。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Sep 1;58:89-95. doi: 10.2340/jphs.v58.7314.
6
Nonpalmar Endoscopic versus Open Trigger Finger Release: Results from a Prospective Trial.非掌侧内镜下与开放性扳机指松解术:一项前瞻性试验的结果
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Oct 7;10(10):e4603. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004603. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Local Corticosteroid Injections versus Surgical Carpal Tunnel Release for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.局部注射皮质类固醇与手术治疗腕管综合征的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Life (Basel). 2022 Apr 4;12(4):533. doi: 10.3390/life12040533.
8
Open versus Single- or Dual-Portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮内镜下腕管松解术与单切口或双切口内镜下腕管松解术的比较:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。
Hand (N Y). 2023 Sep;18(6):978-986. doi: 10.1177/15589447221075665. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
9
'INSIGHT-PRECISION': a new, mini-invasive technique for the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.“INSIGHT - 精准术式”:一种用于腕管综合征手术治疗的新型微创技术。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Jan;48(1):300060519878082. doi: 10.1177/0300060519878082. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
10
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous carpal tunnel release in patients on hemodialysis: early experiences and clinical outcomes.血液透析患者的超声引导下经皮腕管松解术:早期经验与临床结果
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Jun 10;15:711-717. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S206362. eCollection 2019.