• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在(非)相互依存博弈中对道德和能力的认知

Perceptions of morality and competence in (non)interdependent games.

作者信息

Krueger Joachim I, DiDonato Theresa E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 May;134(1):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.010
PMID:20117759
Abstract

Individuals' actions and their stated beliefs affect how others perceive them. In a prisoner's dilemma, a defector who expects others to cooperate is perceived as less moral than a defector who expects others to defect; a cooperator who expects others to defect is perceived as less competent than a cooperator who expects others to cooperate (Experiment 1). This pattern suggests that in a context of interdependence, a stated expectation that the behavior of others will resemble one's own may protect one's social reputation. When outcomes are not interdependent, expectations do not moderate the effects of behavior on reputation (Experiment 2). In such a context, inductive reasoning is sufficient to explain social projection. Both types of results are replicated in a modified N-person social dilemma (Experiment 3), further validating the inductive-reasoning hypothesis.

摘要

个体的行为及其所宣称的信念会影响他人对他们的看法。在囚徒困境中,预期他人会合作的背叛者被认为比预期他人会背叛的背叛者道德水平更低;预期他人会背叛的合作者被认为比预期他人会合作的合作者能力更差(实验1)。这种模式表明,在相互依存的情境中,宣称他人的行为会与自己相似的预期可能会保护一个人的社会声誉。当结果不存在相互依存关系时,预期不会调节行为对声誉的影响(实验2)。在这种情境下,归纳推理足以解释社会投射。这两种类型的结果在经过修改的N人社会困境中得到了重复验证(实验3),进一步证实了归纳推理假设。

相似文献

1
Perceptions of morality and competence in (non)interdependent games.在(非)相互依存博弈中对道德和能力的认知
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 May;134(1):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
2
Perceptions of self and other in the prisoner's dilemma: outcome bias and evidential reasoning.囚徒困境中自我与他人的认知:结果偏差与证据推理
Am J Psychol. 2007 Winter;120(4):593-618.
3
Game relativity: how context influences strategic decision making.博弈相对性:情境如何影响战略决策
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):131-49. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.131.
4
The name of the game: predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves.游戏名称:声誉的预测能力与情境标签在决定囚徒困境博弈行动中的比较
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;30(9):1175-85. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264004.
5
Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.敌友之间:社会决策中内隐可信度判断的影响
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):796-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
6
Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility.感知到的共识会影响群体间行为和刻板印象的可及性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Apr;80(4):645-54.
7
What is moral about guilt? Acting "prosocially" at the disadvantage of others.内疚感有何道德可言?以牺牲他人为代价而“亲社会”地行事。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar;100(3):462-73. doi: 10.1037/a0021459.
8
A new consequence of Simpson's paradox: stable cooperation in one-shot prisoner's dilemma from populations of individualistic learners.辛普森悖论的一个新结果:来自个人主义学习者群体的一次性囚徒困境中的稳定合作。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Aug;137(3):403-21. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.3.403.
9
Friend or foe: subjective expected relative similarity as a determinant of cooperation.敌友之间:主观预期相对相似度作为合作的一个决定因素
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Aug;138(3):341-50. doi: 10.1037/a0016073.
10
Evolutionary escape from the prisoner's dilemma.从囚徒困境中实现进化逃逸。
J Theor Biol. 2007 Apr 7;245(3):411-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Oct 18.