Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institut del Tòrax, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Sep;140(3):633-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.009. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Pulmonary vein isolation is indicated in patients with symptomatic isolated atrial fibrillation not controlled with antiarrhythmic therapy. We describe our surgical experience with thoracoscopic pulmonary vein isolation in patients in whom percutaneous ablation has failed.
Thirty-four adult patients with unsuccessful catheter ablations (range 1-4, mean 2 +/- 1) underwent thoracoscopic bipolar-radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. Seventeen patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 12 with persistent and 5 with long-standing persistent fibrillation, for a mean of 6 years (range 3-10 years), 13 years (5-25 years), and 9 years (3-15 years), respectively.
There was no mortality during the procedure or follow-up (mean 16 +/- 11 months). Two patients needed conversion to thoracotomy owing to hemorrhage, and ablation could not be completed. Antiarrhythmic therapy was withdrawn 3 months postoperatively. Postoperative sinus rhythm was maintained in 82% of those with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (13/15 at 6 months, 9/11 at 12 months), 60% had persistent atrial fibrillation (8/12 at 6 months and 6/10 at 12 months), and 20% had long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (1/5 at 6 and 12 months). Preoperative left atrial diameter significantly differed between patients with paroxysmal fibrillation (mean 42 +/- 6 mm) and those with persistent and long-standing persistent fibrillation (means 50 +/- 4 and 47 +/- 2 mm). Left atrial size greater than 45 mm and atrial fibrillation type were preoperative factors that significantly influenced outcome in the univariate logistic regression analysis.
Thoracoscopic pulmonary vein isolation in patients with previously unsuccessful catheter ablations demonstrates satisfactory sinus rhythm maintenance rates in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation, but not in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. As with other minimally invasive surgical techniques, there is an important learning curve.
对于抗心律失常治疗无法控制的有症状孤立性心房颤动患者,推荐进行肺静脉隔离。我们描述了经胸腔镜肺静脉隔离治疗经皮消融失败的患者的手术经验。
34 例经导管消融失败的成年患者(范围 1-4 次,平均 2 +/- 1 次)接受了经胸腔镜双极射频肺静脉隔离。17 例患者患有阵发性心房颤动,12 例持续性,5 例持久性,平均病程为 6 年(范围 3-10 年)、13 年(5-25 年)和 9 年(3-15 年)。
手术过程中和随访期间无死亡(平均 16 +/- 11 个月)。2 例因出血需要转换为开胸手术,无法完成消融。术后 3 个月停用抗心律失常药物。阵发性心房颤动患者中 82%(13/15 在 6 个月时,9/11 在 12 个月时)维持窦性心律,持续性心房颤动患者中 60%(8/12 在 6 个月时,6/10 在 12 个月时)维持窦性心律,持久性心房颤动患者中 20%(1/5 在 6 个月和 12 个月时)维持窦性心律。阵发性心房颤动患者的左心房直径明显小于持续性和持久性心房颤动患者(分别为 42 +/- 6 毫米和 50 +/- 4 毫米和 47 +/- 2 毫米)。左心房大小大于 45 毫米和心房颤动类型是单变量逻辑回归分析中影响手术结果的术前因素。
经胸腔镜肺静脉隔离治疗经皮消融失败的患者,在阵发性和持续性心房颤动中维持窦性心律的效果令人满意,但在持久性心房颤动中效果不佳。与其他微创手术技术一样,存在一个重要的学习曲线。