Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, KY, USA.
J Toxicol Sci. 2010 Feb;35(1):1-8. doi: 10.2131/jts.35.1.
An abbreviated history of the dose-response curve or chemical concentration-effect relationship is presented in this article. No attempt has been made to include all references on the subject. Just an outline, overview, and discussion of the most important eras are presented. The history of dose response may be divided roughly into three Eras, Preclassical, Classical, and Current. Paracelsus, who lived from 1493 to 1541, must be recognized as the first one to realize that dose was the most important issue to deal with in determining whether a chemical was toxic or not. However, that issue seems to have been forgotten and is still ignored by some. The Classical Era began about 1900 and ended about t; he time of the death of Gaddum in 1965, during which almost all of the progress had been made in solving the parameters to use in analyzing data. The Current Era began with the acceptance of the linearized multistage model in the mid-1970's. In this author's opinion, the biggest mistake in all of toxicology occurred with the acceptance and use of the linearized multistage for DNA-reactive carcinogens with dose on a linear scale. It had been clearly established in the Classical Era that dose should be plotted on a logarithmic scale. Plotting dose on a linear scale distorts the curve for low doses so that any attempt to detect the relationship of dose of carcinogen to carcinogenesis is impossible.
本文介绍了剂量反应曲线或化学浓度-效应关系的简要历史。本文没有试图包括该主题的所有参考文献。仅呈现了最主要时期的概述、综述和讨论。剂量反应的历史大致可以分为三个时代,即前古典时代、古典时代和现代时代。生活在 1493 年至 1541 年的帕拉塞尔苏斯(Paracelsus)必须被认为是第一个意识到剂量是决定化学物质是否有毒的最重要问题的人。然而,这个问题似乎被遗忘了,现在仍然被一些人忽视。古典时代大约始于 1900 年,结束于 1965 年加登(Gaddum)去世的时候,在此期间,几乎所有的进展都集中在解决分析数据所使用的参数上。现代时代始于 20 世纪 70 年代中期线性化多阶段模型的接受。在作者看来,毒理学中最大的错误是接受并使用线性化多阶段模型来分析与剂量呈线性关系的 DNA 反应性致癌物。在古典时代,剂量应该用对数刻度绘制这一点已经得到了明确的证实。如果将剂量绘制在线性尺度上,会扭曲低剂量的曲线,从而使任何检测致癌物剂量与致癌作用关系的尝试都变得不可能。