Hafkenscheid A
Sinai Centre, Jewish Mental Health Services, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Jan;83(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb05510.x.
The interrater reliability, temporal stability and factorial, convergent, discriminant and predictive validity of the Nurses Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE-30) were investigated in a heterogeneous group of psychiatric inpatients in the Netherlands (n = 179). Data in support of the scale's dimensional structure (recoverability of Anglo-American subscale structure in this Dutch sample and distinctiveness of subscales), discriminatory power and convergent validity are presented. Interrater reliability was satisfactory at global scale level. However, 3 subscales (irritability, psychosis and depression) were found to lack interrater reliability. Although temporal stability coefficients were high, large score changes are presupposed to show that pre- versus posttherapy differences are attributable to real change rather than error. NOSIE-30 had limited predictive value.
在荷兰一个由各类精神科住院患者组成的群体（n = 179）中，对护士住院患者评估观察量表（NOSIE - 30）的评分者间信度、时间稳定性以及因子效度、聚合效度、区分效度和预测效度进行了调查。文中呈现了支持该量表维度结构（此荷兰样本中英美子量表结构的可恢复性以及子量表的独特性）、区分能力和聚合效度的数据。在整体量表水平上，评分者间信度令人满意。然而，发现有3个子量表（易怒、精神病和抑郁）缺乏评分者间信度。尽管时间稳定性系数较高，但假定有较大的分数变化才能表明治疗前后的差异归因于实际变化而非误差。NOSIE - 30的预测价值有限。
