Suppr超能文献

重新构想遗传咨询中的风险:对临床实践的影响。

Re-conceptualizing risk in genetic counseling: implications for clinical practice.

作者信息

Austin Jehannine C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Rm A3-112 - 3rd Floor, CFRI Translational Lab Building, 938 W28th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 4H4.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2010 Jun;19(3):228-34. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9279-z. Epub 2010 Jan 30.

Abstract

Risk communication is an important component of genetic counseling. However, many authors have noted that after genetic counseling, subjective risk frequently does not match the objective risk provided by the counselor. This inevitably leads to the conclusion that the risk communication process was not "effective". There has been much discussion about how this problem can be better addressed, such that our clients recall numeric risks more accurately after genetic counseling. This article draws on the risk and probability literature from other fields (including psychology, economics, philosophy and climate change) to deconstruct the concepts of "risk" and risk perception to attempt to expand upon and develop thought and discussion about and investigation of the risk communication process in genetic counseling.

摘要

风险沟通是遗传咨询的一个重要组成部分。然而,许多作者指出,在遗传咨询之后,主观风险常常与咨询师提供的客观风险不相符。这不可避免地导致这样一个结论,即风险沟通的过程并不“有效”。关于如何能更好地解决这个问题,已经有很多讨论,以便我们的客户在遗传咨询后能更准确地记住数字风险。本文借鉴了其他领域(包括心理学、经济学、哲学和气候变化)的风险和概率文献,来解构“风险”和风险认知的概念,试图拓展并深化关于遗传咨询中风险沟通过程的思考、讨论及调查。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic and family counselling for schizophrenia: Where do we stand now?精神分裂症的遗传与家庭咨询:我们目前的进展如何?
S Afr J Psychiatr. 2016 May 6;22(1):831. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v22i1.831. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

3
Anchoring-and-adjustment bias in communication of disease risk.疾病风险沟通中的锚定与调整偏差。
Med Decis Making. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):193-201. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08327395. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验