Jansen Christoph
Fachanwalt für Medizinrecht, Düsseldorf.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2009;103(10):658-61; discussion 669-71. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2009.09.040.
Before December 31, 2002 hospital options were limited to demand-oriented individual authorisations and ambulatory emergency care, so there was no competition against private practice physicians. For the first time the Healthcare Reform Act (GSG) provided hospitals with the opportunity to offer ambulatory services from January 1, 2003 in individual areas of care (pre- and post inpatient treatments according to Sect. 116a SGB and ambulatory surgical interventions according to Sect. 115b SGB V). Following numerous reform acts the spectrum for hospitals has been considerably extended today, particularly by establishing medical service centres (MVZ) and the authorisation to provide certain ambulatory services according to Sect. 116b para. 2-6 SGB V after special approval. Conversely, an amendment of Sect. 20 para. 2 Aerzte-ZV from January 1, 2007 enabled office-based physicians to be employed in a hospital and provide inpatient care so that today we may speak--at least in important sections--of a competitive situation on different levels.
2002年12月31日前,医院的选择仅限于需求导向型的个体授权和门诊急诊护理,因此不存在与私人执业医生的竞争。《医疗改革法》(GSG)首次为医院提供了从2003年1月1日起在个别护理领域提供门诊服务的机会(根据《社会法典》第116a条进行住院前和住院后的治疗,以及根据《社会法典》第五编第115b条进行门诊手术干预)。经过多次改革法案,如今医院的服务范围已大幅扩大,特别是通过设立医疗服务中心(MVZ)以及在获得特别批准后根据《社会法典》第五编第116b条第2至6款授权提供某些门诊服务。相反,自2007年1月1日起对《医生职业法》第20条第2款的修订,使在诊所工作的医生能够受雇于医院并提供住院护理,因此如今我们至少在重要领域可以说不同层面存在竞争局面。