Department of Psychology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5303, USA.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Feb;36(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/a0015875.
The classic theory of spatial attention hypothesized 2 modes, voluntary and involuntary. Folk, Remington, and Johnston (1992) reported that even involuntary attention capture by stimuli requires a match between stimulus properties and what the observer is looking for. This surprising conclusion has been confirmed by many subsequent studies. In these studies, however, the observer typically looks for the same property throughout an entire session. Real-world behavior, in contrast, often requires frequent shifts in attentional set. The present study examined whether such shifts weaken attentional settings, allowing task-irrelevant objects to capture attention. Surprisingly, fluctuating control settings did not increase vulnerability to capture by salient stimuli (color singletons and abrupt onsets). We conclude that the attention control system is remarkably flexible, able to rapidly and fully adopt new settings and abandon old settings.
经典的空间注意理论假设了两种模式,即自愿和非自愿。Folk、Remington 和 Johnston(1992)报告说,即使是由刺激引起的非自愿注意力捕捉,也需要刺激特性与观察者正在寻找的东西之间的匹配。这一令人惊讶的结论已被许多后续研究证实。然而,在这些研究中,观察者通常在整个会话中寻找相同的属性。相比之下,现实世界的行为通常需要频繁地改变注意力设置。本研究考察了这种转变是否会削弱注意力设置,从而允许与任务无关的物体吸引注意力。令人惊讶的是,波动的控制设置并没有增加对显著刺激(颜色单一和突然出现)的捕获敏感性。我们的结论是,注意控制系统非常灵活,能够快速而完全地采用新的设置并放弃旧的设置。