• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多种神经元活动模式有助于前额叶和顶叶皮质中注意力分散的控制。

Diverse neuronal activity patterns contribute to the control of distraction in the prefrontal and parietal cortex.

作者信息

Sapountzis Panagiotis, Antoniadou Alexandra, Gregoriou Georgia G

机构信息

Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

出版信息

PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 27;23(1):e3003008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003008. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003008
PMID:39869632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11801722/
Abstract

Goal-directed behavior requires the effective suppression of distractions to focus on the task at hand. Although experimental evidence suggests that brain areas in the prefrontal and parietal lobe contribute to the selection of task-relevant and the suppression of task-irrelevant stimuli, how conspicuous distractors are encoded and effectively ignored remains poorly understood. We recorded neuronal responses from 2 regions in the prefrontal and parietal cortex of macaques, the frontal eye field (FEF) and the lateral intraparietal (LIP) area, during a visual search task, in the presence and absence of a salient distractor. We found that in both areas, salient distractors are encoded by both response enhancement and suppression by distinct neuronal populations. In FEF, a larger proportion of units displayed suppression of responses to the salient distractor compared to LIP, with suppression effects in FEF being correlated with search time. Moreover, in FEF but not in LIP, the suppression for the salient distractor compared to non-salient distractors that shared the target color could not be accounted for by an enhancement of target features. These results reveal a distinct contribution of FEF in the suppression of salient distractors. Critically, we found that in both areas, the population level representations of the target and singleton locations were not orthogonal, suggesting a mechanism of interference from salient stimuli.

摘要

目标导向行为需要有效抑制干扰以专注于手头任务。尽管实验证据表明前额叶和顶叶的脑区有助于选择与任务相关的刺激并抑制与任务无关的刺激,但显著干扰物是如何被编码并有效忽略的仍知之甚少。在一项视觉搜索任务中,我们记录了猕猴前额叶和顶叶皮质两个区域,即额眼区(FEF)和顶内沟外侧区(LIP),在有和没有显著干扰物情况下的神经元反应。我们发现,在这两个区域中,显著干扰物由不同神经元群体的反应增强和抑制来编码。在额眼区,与顶内沟外侧区相比,更大比例的神经元对显著干扰物的反应表现出抑制,额眼区的抑制效应与搜索时间相关。此外,在额眼区而非顶内沟外侧区,与共享目标颜色的非显著干扰物相比,对显著干扰物的抑制不能通过目标特征增强来解释。这些结果揭示了额眼区在抑制显著干扰物方面的独特作用。至关重要的是,我们发现,在这两个区域中,目标和单独物体位置的群体水平表征并非正交,这表明存在来自显著刺激的干扰机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/830a38d13083/pbio.3003008.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/0fa9b65e02fe/pbio.3003008.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/d32ef1d481a8/pbio.3003008.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/3c4f178c1de6/pbio.3003008.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/cb27ecfb4861/pbio.3003008.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/8ee6f204b423/pbio.3003008.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/ec8a166c7a4a/pbio.3003008.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/830a38d13083/pbio.3003008.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/0fa9b65e02fe/pbio.3003008.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/d32ef1d481a8/pbio.3003008.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/3c4f178c1de6/pbio.3003008.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/cb27ecfb4861/pbio.3003008.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/8ee6f204b423/pbio.3003008.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/ec8a166c7a4a/pbio.3003008.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9f/11801722/830a38d13083/pbio.3003008.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Diverse neuronal activity patterns contribute to the control of distraction in the prefrontal and parietal cortex.多种神经元活动模式有助于前额叶和顶叶皮质中注意力分散的控制。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 27;23(1):e3003008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003008. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.经 TMS 探究分心物过滤的神经机制及其历史相关调制。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7591-7603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2740-18.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Prefrontal Control of Visual Distraction.前额叶控制视觉分心。
Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 5;28(3):414-420.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.023. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
4
Responses of intraparietal neurons to saccadic targets and visual distractors.顶内神经元对扫视目标和视觉干扰物的反应。
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Sep;78(3):1574-89. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.3.1574.
5
Distinct roles of prefrontal and parietal areas in the encoding of attentional priority.前额叶和顶叶区域在注意力优先级编码中的不同作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):E8755-E8764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804643115. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
A functional hierarchy within the parietofrontal network in stimulus selection and attention control.顶额网络中的功能层级在刺激选择和注意控制中。
J Neurosci. 2013 May 8;33(19):8359-69. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4058-12.2013.
7
Representation of remembered stimuli and task information in the monkey dorsolateral prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex.猴子背外侧前额叶和后顶叶皮层中记忆刺激和任务信息的表达。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jan 1;113(1):44-57. doi: 10.1152/jn.00413.2014. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
8
Complementary roles for primate frontal and parietal cortex in guarding working memory from distractor stimuli.灵长类动物前额叶和顶叶皮层在保护工作记忆免受干扰刺激方面的互补作用。
Neuron. 2014 Jul 2;83(1):226-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.009.
9
Distinct neural mechanisms of distractor suppression in the frontal and parietal lobe.额叶和顶叶中分心物抑制的不同神经机制。
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Jan;16(1):98-104. doi: 10.1038/nn.3282. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
10
A pure salience response in posterior parietal cortex.后顶叶皮层的纯粹突显反应。
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Nov;21(11):2498-506. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr035. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence against the low-salience account of attentional suppression.注意力抑制的低显著性解释的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Oct;50(10):1033-1047. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001234. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
Mixed selectivity: Cellular computations for complexity.混合选择性:复杂性的细胞计算
Neuron. 2024 Jul 17;112(14):2289-2303. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 May 9.
3
The Distractor Positivity Component and the Inhibition of Distracting Stimuli.干扰项积极性成分与对干扰性刺激的抑制
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Nov 1;35(11):1693-1715. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02051.
4
The role of salience in the suppression of distracting stimuli.突显在抑制分心刺激中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2262-2271. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02302-5. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
Feature-blind attentional suppression of salient distractors.特征盲注意抑制显著的分心物。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul;85(5):1409-1424. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02712-6. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
6
Global enhancement of target color-not proactive suppression-explains attentional deployment during visual search.全局增强目标颜色而非主动抑制解释了视觉搜索过程中的注意力部署。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jun;152(6):1705-1722. doi: 10.1037/xge0001350. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
7
Inversion of pop-out for a distracting feature dimension in monkey visual cortex.猴子视觉皮层中对分心特征维度的突显反转。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 28;120(9):e2210839120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210839120. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
8
Distractibility and impulsivity neural states are distinct from selective attention and modulate the implementation of spatial attention.注意力分散和冲动的神经状态与选择性注意不同,并且调节空间注意力的实施。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 15;13(1):4796. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32385-y.
9
Prefrontal Control of Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms of Visual Suppression.前额叶对视觉抑制的主动性和反应性机制的控制。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Jun 16;32(13):2745-2761. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab378.
10
Do we need attentional suppression?我们需要注意力抑制吗?
Vis cogn. 2021 Sep 28;29(9):580-582. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1918304. eCollection 2021.