Pouw Wim T J L, Mavilidi Myrto-Foteini, van Gog Tamara, Paas Fred
Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Early Start Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Cogn Process. 2016 Aug;17(3):269-77. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0757-6. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
Non-communicative hand gestures have been found to benefit problem-solving performance. These gestures seem to compensate for limited internal cognitive capacities, such as visual working memory capacity. Yet, it is not clear how gestures might perform this cognitive function. One hypothesis is that gesturing is a means to spatially index mental simulations, thereby reducing the need for visually projecting the mental simulation onto the visual presentation of the task. If that hypothesis is correct, less eye movements should be made when participants gesture during problem solving than when they do not gesture. We therefore used mobile eye tracking to investigate the effect of co-thought gesturing and visual working memory capacity on eye movements during mental solving of the Tower of Hanoi problem. Results revealed that gesturing indeed reduced the number of eye movements (lower saccade counts), especially for participants with a relatively lower visual working memory capacity. Subsequent problem-solving performance was not affected by having (not) gestured during the mental solving phase. The current findings suggest that our understanding of gestures in problem solving could be improved by taking into account eye movements during gesturing.
研究发现,非言语手势有助于提高解决问题的能力。这些手势似乎可以弥补有限的内部认知能力,比如视觉工作记忆容量。然而,目前尚不清楚手势是如何发挥这种认知功能的。一种假设认为,做手势是一种对心理模拟进行空间索引的方式,从而减少了将心理模拟视觉投射到任务视觉呈现上的需求。如果这一假设正确,那么在解决问题时做手势的参与者比不做手势的参与者眼球运动应该更少。因此,我们使用移动眼动追踪技术,研究在解决汉诺塔问题的过程中,伴随思考的手势和视觉工作记忆容量对眼球运动的影响。结果显示,做手势确实减少了眼球运动的次数(较低的扫视次数),尤其是对于视觉工作记忆容量相对较低的参与者。在心理解决阶段是否做手势,对后续的问题解决能力没有影响。目前的研究结果表明,通过考虑做手势时的眼球运动,我们对解决问题过程中手势的理解可能会得到改善。