Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Perinat Med. 2010 May;38(3):305-9. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2010.033.
To establish how different methods of estimating gestational age (GA) affect reliability of first-trimester screening for Down syndrome.
Retrospective single-center study of 100 women with a viable singleton pregnancy, who had first-trimester screening. We calculated multiples of the median (MoM) for maternal-serum free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (free beta-hCG) and pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), derived from either last menstrual period (LMP) or ultrasound-dating scans.
In women with a regular cycle, LMP-derived estimates of GA were two days longer (range -11 to 18), than crown-rump length (CRL)-derived estimates of GA whereas this discrepancy was more pronounced in women who reported to have an irregular cycle, i.e., six days (range -7 to 32). Except for PAPP-A in the regular-cycle group, all differences were significant. Consequently, risk estimates are affected by the mode of estimating GA. In fact, LMP-based estimates revealed ten "screen-positive" cases compared to five "screen-positive" cases where GA was derived from dating-scans.
Provided fixed values for nuchal translucency are applied, dating-scans reduce the number of screen-positive findings on the basis of biochemical screening. We recommend implementation of guidelines for Down syndrome screening based on CRL-dependent rather than LMP-dependent parameters of GA.
研究不同的孕周(GA)估计方法如何影响唐氏综合征的早孕期筛查的可靠性。
对 100 例单活胎妊娠且进行了早孕期筛查的孕妇进行回顾性单中心研究。我们根据末次月经(LMP)或超声检查计算母体血清游离β人绒毛膜促性腺激素(free beta-hCG)和妊娠相关血浆蛋白 A(PAPP-A)的中位数倍数(MoM)。
在月经周期规律的女性中,LMP 估计的 GA 比头臀长(CRL)估计的 GA 长两天(范围为-11 至 18),而在报告月经周期不规则的女性中,这种差异更为明显,即长六天(范围为-7 至 32)。除了规律周期组中的 PAPP-A 外,所有差异均有统计学意义。因此,风险估计受到估计 GA 方式的影响。事实上,LMP 估计值显示有 10 例“筛查阳性”病例,而根据超声检查得出的 GA 则有 5 例“筛查阳性”病例。
如果应用固定的颈项透明层值,那么根据生化筛查,超声检查会减少“筛查阳性”的发现。我们建议根据 CRL 相关参数而不是 LMP 相关参数来制定唐氏综合征筛查的指南。