van 't Veen Hanneke, Kuipers Koen, Schipper Aafke, Marques Alexandra, Schelhaas Mart-Jan, Alkemade Rob
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Global Sustainability, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Radboud University, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Department of Environmental Science, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Jun;31(6):e70279. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70279.
Transitions to forest management that mitigate negative effects of forest use on biodiversity are required to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. To facilitate such transitions, it is vital to understand the effects of different forest management practices on biodiversity. In this study, we analyzed observation data of 182 studies (312,453 abundance values) from three global biodiversity databases to estimate the effects of seven types of forest management on plant and animal (i.e., insects and vertebrates) biodiversity over time, and on threatened animals. We captured biodiversity in four distinct metrics (i.e., quantifiable measures of community composition): (i) intactness, (ii) relative species richness, (iii) compositional similarity, and (iv) relative total abundance, all calculated as the difference in biodiversity between managed and undisturbed forests. Overall, we find larger effects of forest management on intactness and similarity compared to richness and abundance. This suggests that forest management leads to a loss of species that specifically occur in undisturbed forests but that this decline is partially offset by an influx of species from other areas. We find that extensive forest management, such as selective cutting and agroforestry, supports higher levels of overall and threatened biodiversity than intensive management, such as forest and perennial tree crop plantations. We also find significant increases in animal community intactness and similarity in agroforests and forest plantations over 40 and 80 years since establishment, respectively, but do not find this for relative species richness and total abundance. This indicates that animal communities in these management systems become increasingly similar to those of undisturbed forests. Overall, our results highlight the potential of selective cutting and agroforests to mitigate biodiversity loss compared to more intensive systems, as well as the potential of longer rotation periods in forest plantations to increase habitat availability for species specifically adapted to undisturbed forests.
为扭转生物多样性丧失的趋势,需要向能够减轻森林利用对生物多样性负面影响的森林管理方式转变。为推动此类转变,了解不同森林管理实践对生物多样性的影响至关重要。在本研究中,我们分析了来自三个全球生物多样性数据库的182项研究(312,453个丰度值)的观测数据,以估计七种森林管理方式随时间对植物和动物(即昆虫和脊椎动物)生物多样性以及对受威胁动物的影响。我们用四个不同指标(即群落组成的可量化度量)来衡量生物多样性:(i)完整性,(ii)相对物种丰富度,(iii)组成相似性,以及(iv)相对总丰度,所有这些指标均计算为经营森林和未受干扰森林之间生物多样性的差异。总体而言,我们发现森林管理对完整性和相似性的影响比对丰富度和丰度的影响更大。这表明森林管理导致了特别存在于未受干扰森林中的物种的丧失,但这种下降部分被来自其他地区的物种流入所抵消。我们发现,与森林和多年生树木作物种植园等集约管理方式相比,选择性砍伐和农林业等粗放型森林管理方式能支持更高水平的整体生物多样性和受威胁生物多样性。我们还发现,自建立以来,农林业和森林种植园中的动物群落完整性和相似性分别在40年和80年后显著增加,但相对物种丰富度和总丰度未出现这种情况。这表明这些管理系统中的动物群落与未受干扰森林中的动物群落越来越相似。总体而言,我们的结果凸显了与更集约的系统相比,选择性砍伐和农林业在减轻生物多样性丧失方面的潜力,以及森林种植园中较长轮伐期在增加特别适应未受干扰森林的物种的栖息地可用性方面的潜力。