Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Terapia Intensiva Respiratoria, Ospedale Civico, ARNAS, Via C. Lazzaro, Palermo, Italy.
Respir Med. 2010 May;104(5):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Tracheostomy is increasingly performed in intensive care units (ICU), with many patients transferred to respiratory ICU (RICU). Indications/timing for closing tracheostomy are discussed.
We report results of a one-year survey evaluating: 1) clinical characteristics, types of tracheostomy, complications in patients admitted to Italian RICU in 2006; 2) clinical criteria and systems for performing decannulation, and outcome of patients undergoing tracheostomy (number decannulated; number non-decannulated/non-ventilated; number non-decannulated/ventilated; dead/lost patients).
22/32 RICUs replied. There were 846 admissions of 719 patients (Mean age 64,3 (+/-14.2) years, 489 (68%) males). Causes of admission were: acute respiratory failure with underlying chronic co-morbidities 176 (24.4%); exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 222 (34.4%); neuromuscular diseases 200 (27.8%); surgical patients 77 (10.7%); thoracic dysmorphism 28 (3.8%); obstructive sleep apnea syndrome 16 (2.2%). Percutaneous tracheostomies were 65.9%. Major complications after tracheostomy were 2%. 427 tracheostomies were evaluated for decannulation: 96 (22.5%) were closed; 175 patients (41%) were discharged with home mechanical ventilation; 114 patients (26.5%) maintained the tracheostomy despite weaning from mechanical ventilation and 42 patients (10%) died or lost. The clinical criteria chosen for decannulation were: stability of respiratory conditions, effective cough, underlying diseases and ability to swallow. The systems for evaluating feasibility of decannulation were: closure of tracheostomy tube; laryngo-tracheoscopy; use of tracheal button and down-sizing.
There were few major complications of tracheostomy. A substantial proportion of patients maintain the tracheostomy despite not requiring mechanical ventilation. There was no agreement on indications and systems for closing tracheostomy.
气管切开术在重症监护病房(ICU)中越来越常见,许多患者被转至呼吸重症监护病房(RICU)。本文报告了一项为期一年的调查结果,该调查评估了 2006 年意大利 RICU 收治的患者:1)临床特征、气管切开术类型、并发症;2)拔管的临床标准和系统,以及行气管切开术患者的结局(拔管人数、未拔管/未通气人数、未拔管/通气人数、死亡/失联人数)。
22/32 个 RICU 回复了调查。共 846 例 719 名患者入院(平均年龄 64.3±14.2 岁,489 名男性,占 68%)。入院原因:伴有基础慢性合并症的急性呼吸衰竭 176 例(24.4%);慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重 222 例(34.4%);神经肌肉疾病 200 例(27.8%);外科患者 77 例(10.7%);胸畸形 28 例(3.8%);阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征 16 例(2.2%)。经皮气管切开术占 65.9%。气管切开术后主要并发症为 2%。对 427 例气管切开术进行了拔管评估:96 例(22.5%)关闭;175 例(41%)出院时接受家庭机械通气;114 例(26.5%)尽管已脱离机械通气,但仍保留气管切开术;42 例(10%)死亡或失联。选择用于拔管的临床标准:呼吸状况稳定、有效咳嗽、基础疾病和吞咽能力。评估拔管可行性的系统包括:气管切开管关闭、喉镜检查、气管扣使用和气管切开管缩小。
气管切开术的并发症较少。尽管不需要机械通气,但仍有相当一部分患者保留气管切开术。对于气管切开术的适应证和关闭系统,尚无共识。