Department of Pharmacology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2010 Apr 25;632(1-3):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.01.018. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
This study applies new magnetic sensor-electromyographic technology for recording jaw movements in freely moving rats to analyse topographies of orofacial movement that occur in association with individual elements of behaviour under challenge with two dopamine D(1)-like receptor agonists, SKF 83822 ([R/S]-6-chloro-7, 8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) and SKF 83959([R/S]-3-methyl-6-chloro-7, 8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine). Grooming of the snout/face involved primarily dominant-mouth opening jaw movements with small activation of digastric muscles; subsequent grooming of the flank/trunk was characterised by repetitive, uniform jaw movements with small activation of digastric and masseter muscles. In contrast, grooming of the fingers and tail typically involved high-frequency jaw movements with variable vertical jaw movements and/or strong activation of masseter muscles. Vacuous chewing involved two distinct patterns of jaw movements: a dominant-closing pattern, with strong activation of masseter muscles, and a dominant-opening pattern, with slight activation of masseter muscles. SKF 83822 stimulates dopamine D(1)-like receptors and activates adenylate cyclase but not phosphoinositide hydrolysis, while SKF 83959 stimulates dopamine D(1)-like receptors and activates phosphoinositide hydrolysis but not adenylate cyclase. These agonists exerted differential effects on jaw movements, as SKF 83959 induced more jaw movements per episode of syntactic grooming than SKF 83822, while SKF 83822 induced more jaw movements during non-syntactic grooming than SKF 83959. Magnetic sensor technology in freely moving animals resolved distinct topographies of orofacial movement and informs on their relationship to other behaviours in the rodent repertoire and to dopamine D(1)-like receptor function.
本研究应用新型磁传感器-肌电图技术记录自由活动大鼠的下颌运动,以分析在两种多巴胺 D1 样受体激动剂 SKF 83822([R/S]-6-氯-7,8-二羟基-3-丙烯基-1-[3-甲基-苯基]-2,3,4,5-四氢-1H-3-苯并氮杂卓)和 SKF 83959([R/S]-3-甲基-6-氯-7,8-二羟基-1-[3-甲基-苯基]-2,3,4,5-四氢-1H-3-苯并氮杂卓)作用下,与行为的各个元素相关联的口面部运动的地形。梳理鼻子/脸主要涉及主要的张口下颌运动,二腹肌肌肉的激活较小;随后对侧腹/躯干的梳理特征是重复的、均匀的下颌运动,二腹肌和咬肌肌肉的激活较小。相比之下,手指和尾巴的梳理通常涉及高频的下颌运动,下颌运动的垂直变化和/或咬肌肌肉的强烈激活。空咀嚼涉及两种不同的下颌运动模式:一个主导关闭模式,伴随着咬肌肌肉的强烈激活,以及一个主导开放模式,伴随着咬肌肌肉的轻微激活。SKF 83822 刺激多巴胺 D1 样受体并激活腺苷酸环化酶,但不激活磷酯酶水解,而 SKF 83959 刺激多巴胺 D1 样受体并激活磷酯酶水解,但不激活腺苷酸环化酶。这些激动剂对下颌运动产生了不同的影响,因为 SKF 83959 诱导的每一次语法梳理事件中的下颌运动比 SKF 83822 多,而 SKF 83822 在非语法梳理期间诱导的下颌运动比 SKF 83959 多。自由活动动物的磁传感器技术解决了口面部运动的不同地形,并告知它们与啮齿动物行为库中的其他行为以及多巴胺 D1 样受体功能的关系。