Bachorik P S, Cloey T A, Finney C A, Lowry D R, Becker D M
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ann Intern Med. 1991 May 1;114(9):741-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-741.
To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of lipoprotein-cholesterol measurements obtained during screening.
Cross-sectional study.
From November 1989 to January 1990, 154 adults were screened.
Split venous samples from fasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with screening and standardized laboratory methods. Low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels were calculated using the Friedewald equation. Split venous samples from nonfasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol. Capillary blood samples were analyzed for total cholesterol with the screening method.
Total cholesterol measurements in screening venous blood samples were 5.4% and 3.8% lower than the laboratory values in samples from fasting and nonfasting participants, respectively. Triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol values in venous samples obtained from fasting participants were, on average, 9.8% and 11.2% lower than the respective laboratory measurements. Screening HDL-cholesterol values varied, differing from the laboratory values by as much as 40% in 95% of participants. In fasting participants, total cholesterol in capillary samples averaged 5.5% higher than in venous samples; in nonfasting participants the capillary samples were 3.1% higher. Screening for either total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol identified 93% of the persons with LDL-cholesterol values of 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) or higher.
Total cholesterol can be reliably measured in samples from fasting or nonfasting persons. The values in capillary blood samples were slightly higher than those in venous samples. Screening HDL-cholesterol values were too variable to establish the HDL-cholesterol level reliably. Participants with high LDL-cholesterol levels were identified as accurately by measuring total cholesterol only when compared with calculating the LDL-cholesterol level from total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL-cholesterol concentrations.
评估筛查过程中获得的脂蛋白胆固醇测量值的准确性和可靠性。
横断面研究。
1989年11月至1990年1月,对154名成年人进行了筛查。
采用筛查和标准化实验室方法,对空腹参与者的静脉血分离样本进行总胆固醇、甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇分析。使用Friedewald方程计算低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平。对非空腹参与者的静脉血分离样本进行总胆固醇分析。采用筛查方法对毛细血管血样本进行总胆固醇分析。
筛查静脉血样本中的总胆固醇测量值分别比空腹和非空腹参与者样本的实验室值低5.4%和3.8%。空腹参与者静脉样本中的甘油三酯和HDL胆固醇值平均分别比各自的实验室测量值低9.8%和11.2%。筛查的HDL胆固醇值存在差异,95%的参与者其值与实验室值相差高达40%。在空腹参与者中,毛细血管样本中的总胆固醇平均比静脉样本高5.5%;在非空腹参与者中,毛细血管样本高3.1%。对总胆固醇或LDL胆固醇进行筛查可识别出93%的LDL胆固醇值为3.36 mmol/L(130 mg/dL)或更高的人。
空腹或非空腹者的样本中总胆固醇均可可靠测量。毛细血管血样本中的值略高于静脉样本中的值。筛查的HDL胆固醇值变化太大,无法可靠地确定HDL胆固醇水平。仅通过测量总胆固醇来识别高LDL胆固醇水平参与者时,与根据总胆固醇、甘油三酯和HDL胆固醇浓度计算LDL胆固醇水平相比,准确性相同。