Research Development and Innovation Hub, Scottish Ambulance Service, Edinburgh, Scotland; Resuscitation Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Blackburn North, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
Resuscitation. 2022 Jun;175:120-132. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.03.026. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
To examine global variation in the incidence and outcomes of emergency medical services (EMS) witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
We systematically reviewed four electronic databases for studies between 1990 and 5th April 2021 reporting EMS-witnessed OHCA populations. Studies were included if they reported sufficient data to calculate the primary outcome of survival to hospital discharge or 30-day survival. Random-effects models were used to pool incidence and survival outcomes, and meta-regression was used to examine sources of heterogeneity. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.
The search returned 1178 non-duplicate titles of which 66 articles comprising 133,981 EMS-witnessed patients treated by EMS across 33 countries were included. All but one study was observational and only 12 studies (18%) were deemed to be at low risk of bias. The pooled incidence of EMS-treated cases was 4.1 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 3.5, 4.7), varying almost 4-fold across continents. The pooled proportion of survivors to hospital discharge or 30-days was 20% overall (95% CI: 18%, 22%; I = 98%), 43% (95% CI: 37%, 49%; I = 94%) for initial shockable rhythms and 6% (95% CI: 5%, 8%; I = 79%) for initial non-shockable rhythms. In the meta-regression analysis, only region and aetiology were significantly associated with survival. When compared to studies from North America, pooled survival was significantly higher in studies from Europe (14% vs. 26%; p = 0.04) and Australasia (14% vs. 31%, p < 0.001).
We identified significant global variation in the incidence and survival outcome of EMS-witnessed OHCA. Further research is needed to understand the factors contributing to these variations.
考察全球范围内急救医疗服务(EMS)目击院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的发生率和结局。
我们系统地检索了 1990 年至 2021 年 4 月 5 日期间四个电子数据库,以获取报告 EMS 目击 OHCA 人群的研究。如果研究报告了足够的数据来计算主要结局即出院或 30 天生存的存活率,则纳入研究。使用随机效应模型汇总发生率和生存率,并使用荟萃回归检查异质性的来源。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的批判性评估工具评估研究质量。
检索返回 1178 篇非重复标题,其中 66 篇文章包括来自 33 个国家的 133981 例由 EMS 治疗的 EMS 目击患者,纳入研究。除一项研究外,所有研究均为观察性研究,仅有 12 项研究(18%)被认为具有低偏倚风险。EMS 治疗病例的发生率为每 10 万人年 4.1 例(95% CI:3.5,4.7),在各大洲之间差异近 4 倍。总体上,出院或 30 天生存率的 pooled 比例为 20%(95% CI:18%,22%;I = 98%),初始可除颤节律的 pooled 比例为 43%(95% CI:37%,49%;I = 94%),初始非可除颤节律的 pooled 比例为 6%(95% CI:5%,8%;I = 79%)。在荟萃回归分析中,只有区域和病因与生存率显著相关。与来自北美的研究相比,来自欧洲(14%比 26%;p = 0.04)和澳大拉西亚(14%比 31%;p < 0.001)的研究的 pooled 生存率显著更高。
我们发现 EMS 目击 OHCA 的发生率和生存结局存在显著的全球差异。需要进一步研究以了解导致这些差异的因素。