Doherty Zakary, Bray Janet E, Finn Judith, Cartledge Susie
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Resusc Plus. 2025 Jul 15;25:101031. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101031. eCollection 2025 Sep.
This updated systematic review examined the impact of targeting basic life support (BLS) training to groups at high risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) on patient and educational outcomes.
Searches of databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library) were conducted from June 2014 to November 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42021233811). We identified pre-2014 studies from the 2015 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation evaluation of this topic. Two reviewers independently screened titles and full-text papers, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (ROB-2 and ROBINS-I). The certainty of the evidence for each outcome was evaluated using GRADE methodology. A narrative synthesis was performed.
A total of 48 studies (17 new non-randomised studies) were found. While there is evidence of subsequent use of skills and improved survival with the intervention, the quality of evidence remains very-low to low, due to the low number of OHCA events during follow-up and significant loss to follow-up. For educational outcomes, the quality of evidence for CPR skills, confidence and willingness to perform CPR was low to moderate, with most studies showing improvements in these outcomes or skills at guideline recommendations following training. Those trained were also likely to train others.
Despite a large number of studies examining BLS training to those at high-risk of OHCA, the quality of evidence remained largely unchanged. However, the evidence continues to demonstrate that targeting those at high-risk improves simulated CPR skills, and confidence and willingness to provide CPR in likely rescuers.
本更新的系统评价研究了针对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)高危人群进行基础生命支持(BLS)培训对患者和教育成果的影响。
于2014年6月至2024年11月对数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆)进行检索(PROSPERO CRD42021233811)。我们从2015年国际复苏联合委员会对该主题的评估中识别出2014年前的研究。两名评审员独立筛选标题和全文论文,提取数据并评估偏倚风险(ROB-2和ROBINS-I)。使用GRADE方法评估每个结果的证据确定性。进行了叙述性综合分析。
共发现48项研究(17项新的非随机研究)。虽然有证据表明干预后技能的后续使用和生存率有所提高,但由于随访期间OHCA事件数量较少以及大量失访,证据质量仍然非常低至低。对于教育成果,心肺复苏技能、进行心肺复苏的信心和意愿的证据质量为低至中等,大多数研究表明在培训后这些结果或技能按照指南建议有所改善。接受培训的人也可能会培训其他人。
尽管有大量研究考察了对OHCA高危人群的BLS培训,但证据质量基本未变。然而,证据继续表明,针对高危人群进行培训可提高模拟心肺复苏技能,以及可能的救援者进行心肺复苏的信心和意愿。