Safe electronic health record use requires a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework.
作者信息
Sittig Dean F, Classen David C
机构信息
University of Texas at Houston-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences, 6410 Fannin St, UTPB 1100.43, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
出版信息
JAMA. 2010 Feb 3;303(5):450-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.61.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Safe electronic health record use requires a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework.安全使用电子健康记录需要一个全面的监测和评估框架。
JAMA. 2010 Feb 3;303(5):450-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.61.
2
IT: key enabler of value-based care: data drives success.信息技术：基于价值医疗的关键推动因素：数据驱动成功。
Hosp Health Netw. 2013 May;87(5):64.
3
IOM report: 'the path to continuously learning healthcare in America'.美国国家医学院报告：“美国持续学习型医疗保健之路”
Healthc Inform. 2012 Oct-Nov;29(9):30-3.
4
Meaningful use of electronic health records: the road ahead.电子健康记录的有效使用：未来之路。
JAMA. 2010 Oct 20;304(15):1709-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1497.
5
Computers for physicians: never do harm.给医生的电脑：切勿造成伤害。
Care Manag J. 2012;13(4):194-9. doi: 10.1891/1521-0987.13.4.194.
6
Helping physicians achieve quality goals and metrics: the PCIP's experiences.助力医生实现质量目标和指标：PCIP的经验
MD Advis. 2011 Fall;4(4):32-5.
7
Measuring satisfaction with electronic medical record systems in U.S. dialysis facilities.衡量美国透析机构对电子病历系统的满意度。
Nephrol News Issues. 2014 Feb;28(2):29-32.
8
Stage 1 of "meaningful use" of electronic health records released: what it means for RDs and DTRs.电子健康记录“有意义使用”第一阶段发布：对注册营养师和饮食治疗师意味着什么。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Nov;110(11):1616, 1618-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.09.020.
9
Meaningful adoption: what we know or think we know about the financing, effectiveness, quality, and safety of electronic medical records.有意义的采用：我们所知道或自认为知道的关于电子病历的融资、有效性、质量和安全性的情况。
J Leg Med. 2013;34(1):7-42. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2013.768143.
10
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act and Nutrition Inclusion in Medicare/Medicaid Electronic Health Records: leveraging policy to support nutrition care.《经济和临床健康的健康信息技术（HITECH）法案》与医疗保险/医疗补助电子健康记录中的营养纳入：利用政策支持营养护理。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Dec;112(12):1935-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.10.005.
引用本文的文献
1
A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Creator-Consumer Information Interaction Behaviors in Healthcare Documentation Systems.理解医疗文档系统中创作者-消费者信息交互行为的理论框架。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103034. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103034. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
2
Understanding CancelRx: Results of End-to-End Functional Testing, Proactive Risk Assessment, and Pilot Implementation.了解 CancelRx：端到端功能测试、主动风险评估和试点实施的结果。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Mar;10(2):336-347. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688698. Epub 2019 May 22.
3
Assessing the Safety of Custom Web-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Electronic Health Records: A Case Study.评估基于 Web 的定制临床决策支持系统在电子健康记录中的安全性：案例研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Mar;10(2):237-246. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683985. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
Agile Acceptance Test-Driven Development of Clinical Decision Support Advisories: Feasibility of Using Open Source Software.临床决策支持建议的敏捷验收测试驱动开发：使用开源软件的可行性
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Apr 13;6(2):e23. doi: 10.2196/medinform.9679.
5
Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety.进行安全碰头会以主动识别并解决电子健康记录的安全问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):261-267. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw153.
6
Analysis of clinical decision support system malfunctions: a case series and survey.临床决策支持系统故障分析：病例系列研究与调查
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1068-1076. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw005. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
7
Resilient Practices in Maintaining Safety of Health Information Technologies.维护健康信息技术安全的弹性实践
J Cogn Eng Decis Mak. 2014 Sep;8(3):265-282. doi: 10.1177/1555343414534242.
8
Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework.推动医疗保健中诊断错误测量科学的发展：更安全诊断框架
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):103-10. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003675. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
9
The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals.电子处方的安全性：在医院中与两个商业系统相关的系统相关错误的表现、机制和发生率。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):1159-67. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001745. Epub 2013 May 30.
10
Understanding differences in electronic health record (EHR) use: linking individual physicians' perceptions of uncertainty and EHR use patterns in ambulatory care.理解电子健康记录 (EHR) 使用的差异：将个体医生对不确定性的感知与门诊护理中的 EHR 使用模式联系起来。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):73-81. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001377. Epub 2013 May 22.
本文引用的文献
1
Eight rights of safe electronic health record use.安全使用电子健康记录的八项权利。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 9;302(10):1111-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1311.
2
Patient safety and quality improvement act finalized.《患者安全与质量改进法案》最终确定。
J Med Assoc Ga. 2009;98(1):53-4.
3
Reducing health care hazards: lessons from the commercial aviation safety team.减少医疗保健危害：来自商业航空安全团队的经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):w479-89. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w479. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
4
Health care information technology vendors' "hold harmless" clause: implications for patients and clinicians.医疗保健信息技术供应商的“免责”条款：对患者和临床医生的影响。
JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1276-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.398.
5
EHR safety: the way forward to safe and effective systems.电子健康记录安全：迈向安全有效系统的前进道路。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):272-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2618. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
6
Lessons from "Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system".从“实施商业销售的计算机化医师医嘱录入系统后意外增加的死亡率”中吸取的教训
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):797-801. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3132.
7
Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems.用于评估医院实施的住院医师计算机医嘱录入系统的跳蛙方法的开发。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr;15(2):81-4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014969.
Zotero 插件