• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同功率设置下磁致伸缩超声器械的清洁能力和诱导牙本质损耗。

Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings.

机构信息

Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):241-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0379-9. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-009-0379-9
PMID:20127378
Abstract

Some laboratory studies have evaluated the oscillation mode of ultrasonic scalers. None of them recorded its influence on calculus removal and quantified dental hard tissue loss. This study aimed to compare the performance of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings in vitro in relation to the tip oscillation activity. The oscillation activity of the straight Slimline® insert in the Cavitron® ultrasonic scaling device was analyzed at five different power settings with the help of two laser vibrometers. The performance of this instrument was tested on 60 roots of human single-rooted teeth. Twelve roots each were randomly assigned to be instrumented at a given power setting. Every root was instrumented for 120 s at a standardized instrumentation force of 0.1 ± 0.05 N. In addition, another 30 periodontally involved roots with subgingival calculus were instrumented accordingly to assess the calculus removal potential. The surface characteristics after instrumentation were analyzed under scanning electron microscope. The instrumentation at minimum power setting resulted in an mean increase of the root surface roughness of 0.18 ± 0.28 compared to 0.51 ± 0.48 at maximum power setting (P = 0.0327). The loss of dental hard tissue amounted to 11.37 ± 3.64 at minimum compared to 23.37 ± 15.76 at maximum power (P = 0.0010). The higher the power setting, the more calculus was removed. The values of the latter ranged between 4.04 ± 1.87 and 11.26 ± 4.66 mm² of cleaned dentin surface area (P = 0.0065). At lower power settings, a more favorable relation between cleaning ability, loss of dentine, and surface roughness was found.

摘要

一些实验室研究已经评估了超声洁牙机的振动模式。但它们都没有记录其对结石去除的影响,也没有量化牙体硬组织的损失。本研究旨在比较 Cavitron®超声洁牙机中直的 Slimline®插入物在不同功率设置下的性能,同时分析其尖端振动活动。借助两个激光测振仪,分析了 Cavitron®超声洁牙机中 Slimline®插入物在五种不同功率设置下的振动活动。该仪器的性能在 60 个人类单根牙的根上进行了测试。每个根随机分为 12 个,每个根在给定的功率设置下进行操作。每个根用 0.1 ± 0.05 N 的标准化操作力操作 120 s。此外,根据另外 30 个牙周袋内有龈下结石的根,评估其结石去除潜力。在扫描电子显微镜下分析操作后的表面特征。在最小功率设置下操作后,根表面粗糙度平均增加了 0.18 ± 0.28,而在最大功率设置下则增加了 0.51 ± 0.48(P = 0.0327)。与最小功率(11.37 ± 3.64)相比,最大功率(23.37 ± 15.76)时牙体硬组织的损失更大(P = 0.0010)。功率设置越高,去除的结石越多。后者的值在 4.04 ± 1.87 和 11.26 ± 4.66 mm²之间,对应的清洁牙本质表面积(P = 0.0065)。在较低的功率设置下,发现清洁能力、牙本质损失和表面粗糙度之间存在更有利的关系。

相似文献

1
Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings.不同功率设置下磁致伸缩超声器械的清洁能力和诱导牙本质损耗。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):241-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0379-9. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
2
[Calculus removal efficiency and injury potential of vertically oscillating metallic and carbon ultrasonic tips].[垂直振荡金属和碳超声探头的牙结石清除效率及损伤可能性]
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2004;114(11):1116-23.
3
A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument.磁致伸缩和压电超声洁治器械的体外对比研究
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jul;28(7):642-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028007642.x.
4
Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.洁治器尖端设计对超声洁治导致的牙根物质丧失的显著影响:一项激光轮廓测量法体外研究
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Nov;31(11):1003-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00601.x.
5
Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces.铒激光对病变牙根表面的刮治
J Periodontol. 2002 May;73(5):524-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.5.524.
6
Microscopic view of scaling influence on the root, using different power and time settings.使用不同功率和时间设置时,洁治对牙根影响的显微镜视图。
Quintessence Int. 2016;47(7):559-68. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a36094.
7
Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo.超声器械对牙根表面的体内作用的对比研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Jun;12(2):143-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0167-3. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
8
Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments.声波、超声波和往复式洁治器械的体外对比研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 1992 Sep;19(8):560-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1992.tb00684.x.
9
Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?根管预备。电动器械与手动器械,该选哪一种?
Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;42(2):229-44.
10
Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.使用金刚石涂层超声尖对单根牙进行龈下牙石清除的速度和效果的临床评估。
J Periodontol. 1997 May;68(5):436-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.5.436.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a new magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler and a traditional piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler on root surfaces and patient complaints.新型磁致伸缩超声洁牙机和传统压电超声洁牙机对根面及患者舒适度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57037-7.
2
Assessing the effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler tip wear on root surface roughness under influence of various working parameters: A profilometric and atomic force microscopic study.评估在各种工作参数影响下压电超声洁治器尖端磨损对牙根表面粗糙度的影响:一项轮廓测量和原子力显微镜研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Nov-Dec;27(6):583-589. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_416_22. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects.超声波洁牙器振荡与牙齿表面缺陷
J Dent Res. 2009 Mar;88(3):229-34. doi: 10.1177/0022034508330267.
2
Three-dimensional analyses of ultrasonic scaler oscillations.超声洁牙器振荡的三维分析
J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Jan;36(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01339.x. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
3
Advances in power driven pocket/root instrumentation.电动龈下/根面器械的进展。
Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal.
超声探头距离和方向对生物膜清除的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1029-1036. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1854-8. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Static biofilm removal around ultrasonic tips in vitro.体外超声探头周围静态生物膜的清除。
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Sep;18(7):1779-84. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1157-2. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
5
Mechanized scaling with ultrasonics: Perils and proactive measures.超声机械洁治:风险与预防措施
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013 Jul;17(4):423-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.118310.
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):22-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01258.x.
4
Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo.超声器械对牙根表面的体内作用的对比研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Jun;12(2):143-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0167-3. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
5
The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude.磨损对超声洁牙器尖端位移幅度的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Jan;33(1):37-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00861.x.
6
Subgingival curettage in periodontal treatment.牙周治疗中的龈下刮治术。
J Am Dent Assoc. 1952 Mar;44(3):301-14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8177(52)43009-3.
7
Ultrasonic scaler tip performance under various load conditions.不同负载条件下超声洁治器尖端的性能
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Oct;30(10):876-81. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00395.x.
8
A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.一项关于机械驱动和手动龈下刮治术治疗慢性牙周炎疗效的系统评价。
J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:72-81; discussion 90-1. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.4.x.
9
Vibration characteristics of ultrasonic scalers assessed with scanning laser vibrometry.使用扫描激光测振仪评估超声洁牙机的振动特性。
J Dent. 2002 May;30(4):147-51. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00009-x.
10
Tooth substance loss resulting from mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic root instrumentation assessed by liquid scintillation.通过液体闪烁法评估机械、声波和超声波根管预备导致的牙体组织丧失。
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Nov;28(11):1058-66. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.281111.x.