Suppr超能文献

在重症患者中使用复合国际诊断访谈比较CATEGO衍生的ICD-8和DSM-III分类。

Comparison of CATEGO-derived ICD-8 and DSM-III classifications using the composite international diagnostic interview in severely ill subjects.

作者信息

Farmer A E, Jenkins P L, Katz R, Ryder L

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1991 Feb;158:177-82. doi: 10.1192/bjp.158.2.177.

Abstract

Two classifications, DSM-III and CATEGO4-derived ICD-8, included in the CIDI, are compared in 63 in-patients and out-patients with a broad range of psychiatric illness. Agreement for main diagnosis between these classifications was statistically significant for two time frames, the present state and lifetime. However, while diagnostic assignment by CATEGO4 remained fairly constant between time frames, there was a marked shift in DSM-III-assigned diagnosis, with cases changing from anxiety state diagnosis (present state) to affective disorder (lifetime). Thirty-nine subjects were assigned a DSM-III diagnosis of affective disorder for lifetime illness compared with 21 assigned to this diagnostic group by CATEGO4.

摘要

对综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)中包含的两种分类系统,即《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)和源自CATEGO4的《国际疾病分类》第八版(ICD-8),在63名患有广泛精神疾病的住院患者和门诊患者中进行了比较。在两个时间框架(当前状态和终生)内,这两种分类系统在主要诊断方面的一致性具有统计学意义。然而,虽然CATEGO4的诊断分配在不同时间框架内保持相当稳定,但DSM-III分配的诊断有明显变化,病例从焦虑状态诊断(当前状态)转变为情感障碍(终生)。39名受试者被DSM-III诊断为终生情感障碍,而被CATEGO4诊断为该诊断组的有21名。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验