Suppr超能文献

标准化精神科访谈(DIS/CIDI)的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of a standardized psychiatric interview (DIS/CIDI).

作者信息

Semler G, Wittchen H U, Joschke K, Zaudig M, von Geiso T, Kaiser S, von Cranach M, Pfister H

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1987;236(4):214-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00383851.

Abstract

The reliability of DSM-III diagnoses using an expanded version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS), called the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), was evaluated by examining 60 psychiatric inpatients on a test-retest basis. Acceptable agreement coefficients of (kappa) 0.5 or above were found for all but two disorders: dysthymic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. The subclassification of DSM-III affective disorders also revealed some discrepancies between the test and the retest interviews. When compared with results from earlier versions of the DIS, diagnostic reliability was found to have improved for the DSM-III anxiety disorders in particular. These improvements can possibly be attributed to some changes in the wording of the respective items of this section. Several reasons for lowered test-retest reliability are discussed.

摘要

使用一种名为综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)的诊断访谈表扩展版,对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)的诊断可靠性进行了评估,该评估通过对60名精神科住院患者进行重测来完成。除了两种障碍(恶劣心境障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍)之外,所有障碍的一致性系数(kappa)均达到或高于0.5,这一结果是可以接受的。DSM-III情感障碍的子分类在测试访谈和重测访谈之间也显示出一些差异。与早期版本的诊断访谈表结果相比,发现DSM-III焦虑障碍的诊断可靠性尤其有所提高。这些改进可能归因于该部分各个条目的措辞发生了一些变化。文中讨论了重测可靠性降低的几个原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验