• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死和多支冠状动脉疾病分期血运重建术后结局的列线图

Nomogram to Predict Outcomes After Staged Revascularization in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.

作者信息

Wang Huaigen, Ma Aiqun, Wang Tingzhong

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.

Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology (Xi'an Jiaotong University), Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2024 Apr 29;17:1713-1722. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S457236. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S457236
PMID:38706752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11067940/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 50% of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients have multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD). The management strategy for these patients remains controversial. This study aimed to develop predictive models and nomogram of outcomes in STEMI patients with MVD for better identification and classification.

METHODS

The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to select the features most significantly associated with the outcomes. A Cox regression model was built using the selected variables. One nomogram was computed from each model, and individual risk scores were obtained by applying the nomograms to the cohort. After regrouping patients based on nomogram risk scores into low- and high-risk groups, we used the Kaplan-Meier method to perform survival analysis.

RESULTS

The C-index of the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)-free survival model was 0·68 (95% CI 0·62-0·74) and 0·65 [0·62-0·68]) at internal validation, and that of the overall survival model was 0·75 (95% CI 0·66-0·84) and (0·73 [0·65-0·81]). The predictions of both models correlated with the observed outcomes. Low-risk patients had significantly lower probabilities of 1-year or 3-year MACEs (4% versus 11%, = 0.003; 7% versus 15%, =0.01, respectively) and 1-year or 3-year all-cause death (1% versus 3%, =0.048; 2% versus 7%, respectively, =0.001) than high-risk patients.

CONCLUSION

Our nomograms can be used to predict STEMI and MVD outcomes in a simple and practical way for patients who undergo primary PCI for culprit vessels and staged PCI for non-culprit vessels.

摘要

目的

约50%的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者患有多支冠状动脉疾病(MVD)。这些患者的治疗策略仍存在争议。本研究旨在建立STEMI合并MVD患者预后的预测模型和列线图,以更好地进行识别和分类。

方法

采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)方法选择与预后最显著相关的特征。使用选定变量建立Cox回归模型。从每个模型计算一个列线图,并通过将列线图应用于队列获得个体风险评分。根据列线图风险评分将患者重新分组为低风险和高风险组后,我们使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析。

结果

主要不良心血管事件(MACE)无事件生存模型在内部验证时的C指数为0·68(95%CI 0·62 - 0·74)和0·65[0·62 - 0·68]),总生存模型的C指数为0·75(95%CI 0·66 - 0·84)和(0·73[0·65 - 0·81])。两个模型的预测均与观察到的结果相关。低风险患者1年或3年发生MACE的概率(分别为4%对11%,P = 0.003;7%对15%,P = 0.01)以及1年或3年全因死亡的概率(分别为1%对3%,P = 0.048;2%对7%,P = 0.001)均显著低于高风险患者。

结论

我们的列线图可用于以简单实用的方式预测接受罪犯血管直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和非罪犯血管分期PCI的STEMI和MVD患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8f/11067940/17a58f94f067/IJGM-17-1713-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8f/11067940/c5870926b3df/IJGM-17-1713-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8f/11067940/e5882e8d3a58/IJGM-17-1713-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8f/11067940/5ab10069e1d8/IJGM-17-1713-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8f/11067940/17a58f94f067/IJGM-17-1713-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8f/11067940/c5870926b3df/IJGM-17-1713-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8f/11067940/e5882e8d3a58/IJGM-17-1713-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8f/11067940/5ab10069e1d8/IJGM-17-1713-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a8f/11067940/17a58f94f067/IJGM-17-1713-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Nomogram to Predict Outcomes After Staged Revascularization in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死和多支冠状动脉疾病分期血运重建术后结局的列线图
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Apr 29;17:1713-1722. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S457236. eCollection 2024.
2
Outcome of staged percutaneous coronary intervention within two weeks from admission in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者入院后两周内行分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):E262-E268. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27896. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
3
Construction and evaluation of nomogram model for individualized prediction of risk of major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院期间主要不良心血管事件风险个体化预测列线图模型的构建与评估
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 21;9:1050785. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1050785. eCollection 2022.
4
Culprit vessel vs. immediate multivessel vs. out-of-hospital staged intervention for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的罪犯血管干预与即刻多支血管干预及院外分期干预对比
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 23;9:1033475. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1033475. eCollection 2022.
5
Staged revascularization vs. culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死多支血管病变患者的分期血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 9;9:943323. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.943323. eCollection 2022.
6
Culprit Vessel-Only vs. Staged Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.在接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病患者中,罪犯血管单独干预与分期多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的比较
Circ J. 2016;80(2):371-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0493. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
7
Long-term outcomes of in-hospital staged revascularization versus culprit-only intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者住院期间分期血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行干预的长期结局
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 May;30(3):188-195. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000701.
8
Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者采用仅处理罪犯血管、即刻或分期多支血管经皮血管重建策略的长期预后:来自REAL注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):912-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25374. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
9
Timing of Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction.多血管 PCI 治疗心肌梗死的完全血运重建时机。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 12;389(15):1368-1379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307823. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
10
Immediate Versus Staged Multivessel PCI Strategies in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的直接与分期多支血管PCI策略:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Med Sci. 2022 Feb;363(2):161-173. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-Session Versus Staged Multivessel Optimal IVUS-Guided PCI in Patients With CCS or NSTE-ACS.单期与分期多支血管最佳血管内超声引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗用于慢性冠状动脉综合征或非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者
JACC Asia. 2023 Jun 13;3(4):649-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.03.013. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography-guided strategy in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a randomized trial.分数血流储备与血管造影引导策略在多支血管病变急性心肌梗死中的应用:一项随机试验。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Feb 7;44(6):473-484. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac763.
3
Development and validation of a risk prediction nomogram for in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者支架内再狭窄风险预测列线图的建立与验证。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02255-4.
4
Development and Validation of a Risk Nomogram Model for Predicting Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血管重建预测风险列线图模型的开发与验证
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Aug 20;16:1541-1553. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S325385. eCollection 2021.
5
Timing of Nonculprit Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后非罪犯病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时机
Cardiology. 2021;146(5):556-565. doi: 10.1159/000517295. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
6
Establishment and validation of a risk model for prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary PCI.建立并验证一个预测直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内死亡率的风险模型。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01804-7.
7
Cardiac mortality, diabetes mellitus, and multivessel disease in ST elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的心脏死亡率、糖尿病和多血管病变。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 15;323:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
8
Management of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a complex path to precision medicine.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支冠状动脉疾病的管理:通往精准医学的复杂路径。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 1;11:2040622320938527. doi: 10.1177/2040622320938527. eCollection 2020.
9
Long-Term Clinical Outcome according to Changes of Glomerular Filtration Rate in AMI Patients with Multivessel Disease after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后多支血管病变急性心肌梗死患者肾小球滤过率变化的长期临床结局
Chonnam Med J. 2020 May;56(2):121-129. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.2.121. Epub 2020 May 25.
10
Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction.多支血管 PCI 治疗心肌梗死的完全血运重建。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 10;381(15):1411-1421. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775. Epub 2019 Sep 1.