Centre for Sports Studies, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4AG, UK.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010 Feb;35(1):17-22. doi: 10.1139/H09-124.
The impact of different intensity training on cycling efficiency in competitive cyclists is unknown. Twenty-nine endurance-trained competitive male cyclists completed 3 laboratory visits during a 12-week training period. At each visit, their cycling efficiency and maximal oxygen uptake were determined. After the first visit, cyclists were randomly split into 2 groups (A and B). Over the first 6 weeks, between tests 1 and 2, group A was prescribed specific high-intensity training sessions, whereas group B was restricted in the amount of intensive work undertaken. After test 2 and for the second 6-week period, group B was allowed to conduct high-intensity training. Gross efficiency (GE) increased in group A (+1.6 +/- 1.4%; p < 0.05) following the high-intensity training, whereas no significant change was seen in group B (+0.1 +/- 0.7%; p > 0.05). Group B cyclists increased their GE between tests 2 and 3 (+1.4 +/- 0.8%; p < 0.05) but no changes in GE were observed in group A over this period (+0.4 +/- 0.4%; p > 0.05). Delta efficiency (DE) did not change significantly in either group across the study period. This study demonstrates that GE is increased following high-intensity training in competitive male cyclists after 12 weeks.
不同强度训练对竞技自行车手骑行效率的影响尚不清楚。29 名耐力训练有素的竞技男性自行车手在 12 周的训练期间完成了 3 次实验室访问。每次访问时,都会确定他们的骑行效率和最大摄氧量。第一次访问后,自行车手被随机分为 2 组(A 和 B)。在前 6 周的测试 1 和 2 之间,A 组接受了特定的高强度训练课程,而 B 组则限制了进行的密集工作量。在测试 2 之后的第二个 6 周期间,B 组被允许进行高强度训练。高强度训练后,A 组的总效率(GE)增加了(+1.6 +/- 1.4%;p < 0.05),而 B 组没有明显变化(+0.1 +/- 0.7%;p > 0.05)。B 组自行车手在测试 2 和 3 之间增加了 GE(+1.4 +/- 0.8%;p < 0.05),但在这段时间内 A 组的 GE 没有变化(+0.4 +/- 0.4%;p > 0.05)。在整个研究期间,两组的 Delta 效率(DE)都没有明显变化。本研究表明,经过 12 周的高强度训练后,竞技男性自行车手的 GE 会增加。