Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Bedfordshire, Bedford, MK41 9EA, UK.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010 Feb;35(1):27-34. doi: 10.1139/H09-125.
The aim of this study was to explore the potential mechanisms underlying performance changes linked to different warm-up stretch modalities. Twenty-one male collegiate-semiprofessional soccer players (age, 20.8 +/- 2.3 years) performed under 3 different warm-up conditions: a no-stretch warm-up (WU), a warm-up including static passive stretches (SPS), and a warm-up incorporating static dynamic stretches (SDS). Countermovement jump, drop jump, peak torque, heart rate, core temperature, movement kinematics, and electromyography (EMG) were recorded for each intervention. Significant increases (p < 0.001) in performance were recorded for the countermovement, drop jump, and peak torque measures when the SDS was compared with the WU and SPS trials. When mechanism data were analysed, heart rate was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the SDS condition compared with the SPS and WU conditions (a pattern also shown with core temperature), whereas the WU condition heart rate was also significantly higher than the SPS condition heart rate. When EMG data were examined for the rectus femoris muscle, significantly greater (p < 0.01) muscle activity was observed in the SDS condition compared with the SPS condition. It seems the most likely mechanisms to explain the increase in performance in the SDS condition compared with the SPS condition are increased heart rate, greater muscle activity, and increased peak torque.
本研究旨在探究不同热身拉伸方式与运动表现变化相关的潜在机制。21 名男性大学生-半职业足球运动员(年龄,20.8 +/- 2.3 岁)在 3 种不同的热身条件下进行测试:无拉伸热身(WU)、包含静态被动拉伸的热身(SPS)和包含静态动态拉伸的热身(SDS)。对每个干预措施都记录了反跳、跳落和峰值扭矩等跳跃测试、心率、核心温度、运动运动学和肌电图(EMG)数据。与 WU 和 SPS 相比,当 SDS 与 SDS 相比时,反跳、跳落和峰值扭矩的表现都有显著提高(p < 0.001)。当分析机制数据时,SDS 条件下的心率明显高于 SPS 和 WU 条件(核心温度也显示出相同的模式),而 WU 条件下的心率也明显高于 SPS 条件。当检查股直肌的肌电图数据时,SDS 条件下的肌肉活动明显高于 SPS 条件(p < 0.01)。与 SPS 相比,SDS 条件下运动表现提高的最可能机制似乎是心率升高、肌肉活动增加和峰值扭矩增加。