Exercise and Sport Science Department, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager, Manchester, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2614-20. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1f3ef.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the acute effect of different warm-up protocols on anaerobic performance in elite youth soccer players. Twenty elite youth soccer players (mean age 17.2 +/- 1.2 years) performed 3 different warm-up protocols in a random order on nonconsecutive days. Each warm-up protocol consisted of a 5-minute low-intensity jog followed by 10 minutes of static stretching (SS), dynamic stretching (DS), or dynamic stretching followed by 8 front squats + 20% body mass (DSR). Subjects performed a countermovement jump followed by a 10- and 20-m sprint test immediately and at 3 and 6 minutes after each warm-up protocol. Vertical jump performance following DSR was better at 3 and 6 minutes than after DS, which in turn was better than after SS at 0, 3, and 6 minutes (p < 0.05). Jump performance was better at 3 minutes than immediately after, and this improvement was maintained at 6 minutes after DSR (p < 0.05). A better sprint performance was observed after DSR and DS compared with SS immediately and at 3 and 6 minutes following each warm-up protocol (p < 0.05). The results of the study suggest that a dynamic warm-up with the inclusion of resistance enhances jumping ability more than dynamic exercise alone. In addition, a dynamic warm-up produces a superior sprint and jump performance compared to a warm-up consisting of static stretching.
本研究的目的是探究不同热身方案对青少年精英足球运动员无氧表现的急性影响。20 名青少年精英足球运动员(平均年龄 17.2±1.2 岁)在非连续的日子里以随机顺序进行了 3 种不同的热身方案。每种热身方案均包括 5 分钟低强度慢跑,随后进行 10 分钟静态拉伸(SS)、动态拉伸(DS)或动态拉伸后进行 8 次前蹲+20%体重(DSR)。受试者在立即和每个热身方案后 3 分钟和 6 分钟进行了一次深蹲跳和 10 米、20 米冲刺测试。与 DS 相比,DSR 后的垂直跳跃表现更好,而 DS 又优于 SS,分别在 0、3 和 6 分钟时(p<0.05)。3 分钟时的跳跃表现优于立即进行的跳跃表现,且 DSR 后 6 分钟时的这种提高得以维持(p<0.05)。与 SS 相比,DSR 和 DS 后的即刻以及每个热身方案后 3 分钟和 6 分钟时,冲刺表现均更好(p<0.05)。研究结果表明,包含阻力的动态热身比单独的动态运动更能增强跳跃能力。此外,与静态拉伸组成的热身相比,动态热身可产生更优异的冲刺和跳跃表现。