• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)中的捐赠回报和他人偏好。

Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

机构信息

Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2010 Jul;13(4):663-70. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0309-x. Epub 2010 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-010-0309-x
PMID:20130946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8011907/
Abstract

Helping others at no cost to oneself is a simple way to demonstrate other-regarding preferences. Yet, primates exhibit mixed results for other-regarding preferences: chimpanzees and tamarins do not show these effects, whereas capuchin monkeys and marmosets preferentially give food to others. One factor of relevance to this no-cost food donation is the payoff to the donor. Though donors always receive the same payoffs regardless of their choice, previous work varies in whether they receive either a food reward or no food reward. Here, I tested cotton-top tamarins in a preferential giving task. Subjects could choose from two tools, one of which delivered food to a partner in an adjacent cage and the other of which delivered food to an empty cage. Thus, subjects could preferentially give or withhold food from a partner. I varied whether subjects received food payoffs, whether a partner was present or absent, and whether the partner was a non-cagemate or the subject's mate. Results showed that the subjects' overall motivation to pull either tool declined when they did not receive any food. Additionally, they did not preferentially donate or withhold food, regardless of their own payoff or their relationship with the partner. Thus, cotton-top tamarins do not take advantage of cost-free food giving, either when they might gain in the future (mates) or when they have no opportunity for future interactions (non-cagemates).

摘要

帮助他人而不考虑自身利益是体现他人偏好的一种简单方式。然而,灵长类动物在他人偏好方面表现出混合的结果:黑猩猩和绢毛猴没有表现出这些效应,而卷尾猴和狨猴则更倾向于将食物给予他人。与这种无成本食物捐赠相关的一个因素是捐赠者的收益。尽管捐赠者无论选择如何,总是获得相同的收益,但之前的研究在他们是否获得食物奖励或没有食物奖励方面存在差异。在这里,我在偏好给予任务中测试了棉顶狨猴。被试可以从两种工具中选择一种,其中一种将食物传递给隔壁笼子里的伙伴,另一种将食物传递给空笼子。因此,被试可以优先选择给予或 withholding 食物给伙伴。我改变了被试是否获得食物奖励、是否有伙伴在场、以及伙伴是否是非笼伙伴还是被试的伴侣。结果表明,当被试没有获得任何食物奖励时,他们拉动任何工具的整体动机都会下降。此外,无论他们自己的收益或与伙伴的关系如何,他们都不会优先捐赠或 withholding 食物。因此,棉顶狨猴既不会利用免费的食物给予,也不会在未来(伴侣)或未来没有互动机会(非笼伙伴)时利用这种机会。

相似文献

1
Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)中的捐赠回报和他人偏好。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Jul;13(4):663-70. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0309-x. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
2
Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates.合作繁殖的棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus)不会给它们的长期配偶提供奖励。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):231-41. doi: 10.1037/a0015094.
3
Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).不公平感是灵长类动物的祖传特征吗?对棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)的社会不公平现象进行测试。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):10-7. doi: 10.1037/a0012662.
4
The relationship between problem solving and inhibitory control: cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus) performance on a reversed contingency task.问题解决与抑制控制之间的关系:棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)在反向 contingency 任务中的表现。 (注:这里“contingency”可能结合上下文有更准确的专业释义,比如“应急情况”“相依性”等,仅按字面翻译)
J Comp Psychol. 2002 Mar;116(1):39-50. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.116.1.39.
5
Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back.给予他人:基因不相关的棉顶狨猴会优先将食物给予那些会无私回馈食物的个体。
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 22;270(1531):2363-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2509.
6
Means-means-end tool choice in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus): finding the limits on primates' knowledge of tools.棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)的手段-目的工具选择:探寻灵长类动物工具知识的极限
Anim Cogn. 2005 Oct;8(4):236-46. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0246-7. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
7
A two-choice preference assessment with five cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).对五只棉顶狨猴(绢毛猴)进行的二选一偏好评估。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2004;7(3):163-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0703_2.
8
Long-term memory for calls of relatives in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)对亲属叫声的长期记忆。
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Aug;125(3):366-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023149.
9
Spatial cues more salient than color cues in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) reversal learning.棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)逆向学习中空间线索比颜色线索更显著。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 Nov;122(4):441-4. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.4.441.
10
Social communication about unpalatable foods in tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).狨猴(白领伶猴)中关于难吃食物的社交交流。
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):142-148. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.2.142.

引用本文的文献

1
Family first! Influence of parental investment in Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) prosocial choices.家庭第一!父母投资对豚鼠(Cavia porcellus)亲社会选择的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Sep;26(5):1713-1732. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01813-x. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Adult bonobos show no prosociality in both prosocial choice task and group service paradigm.成年倭黑猩猩在亲社会选择任务和群体服务范式中均没有表现出亲社会性。
PeerJ. 2022 Feb 1;10:e12849. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12849. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessing African grey parrots' prosocial tendencies in a token choice paradigm.在代币选择范式中评估非洲灰鹦鹉的亲社会倾向。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Dec 11;6(12):190696. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190696. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task.狼,而不是狗,在触摸屏任务中具有亲社会行为。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0215444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215444. eCollection 2019.
5
Task Differences and Prosociality; Investigating Pet Dogs' Prosocial Preferences in a Token Choice Paradigm.任务差异与亲社会行为;在代币选择范式中探究宠物狗的亲社会偏好
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0167750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167750. eCollection 2016.
6
The nature of prosociality in chimpanzees.黑猩猩的亲社会性本质。
Nat Commun. 2016 Dec 20;7:13915. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13915.
7
Dynamic Duos? Jamaican Fruit Bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) Do Not Show Prosocial Behavior in a Release Paradigm.活力二人组?牙买加果蝠(Artibeus jamaicensis)在放生范式中未表现出亲社会行为。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2016 Nov 20;6(4):25. doi: 10.3390/bs6040025.
8
Inequity aversion strategies between marmosets are influenced by partner familiarity and sex but not oxytocin.狨猴之间的不平等厌恶策略受伙伴熟悉程度和性别影响,但不受催产素影响。
Anim Behav. 2016 Apr 1;114:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.025.
9
Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species.非人类物种亲社会行为实验研究中的关键问题。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Jul;19(4):679-705. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-0973-6. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
10
The evolution of altruistic social preferences in human groups.人类群体中利他社会偏好的演变。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150097. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0097.

本文引用的文献

1
Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members.黑猩猩不会利用成本极低的机会为非亲属群体成员提供食物。
Anim Behav. 2008 May 1;75(5):1757-1770. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.036.
2
Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates.合作繁殖的棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus)不会给它们的长期配偶提供奖励。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):231-41. doi: 10.1037/a0015094.
3
Cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in primates?灵长类动物合作繁殖的认知后果?
Anim Cogn. 2010 Jan;13(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0263-7. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
4
Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are sensitive to others' reward: an experimental analysis of food-choice for conspecifics.卷尾猴(Cebus apella)对他人的奖励很敏感:对同种选择食物的实验分析。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):249-61. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0262-8. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
5
Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).不公平感是灵长类动物的祖传特征吗?对棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)的社会不公平现象进行测试。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):10-7. doi: 10.1037/a0012662.
6
Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).不公平厌恶是否取决于挫折效应?卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的一项测试。
Anim Cogn. 2009 May;12(3):505-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0211-6. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
7
Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others' welfare.卷尾猴对其他同类的福祉很敏感。
Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 11;18(21):R999-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.057.
8
Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys.给予对猴子来说是一种自我奖励。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 9;105(36):13685-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807060105. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
9
Egalitarianism in young children.幼儿中的平等主义。
Nature. 2008 Aug 28;454(7208):1079-83. doi: 10.1038/nature07155.
10
Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically.非人类灵长类动物的利他偏好:普通狨猴会利他地提供食物。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19762-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710310104. Epub 2007 Dec 5.