• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

给予他人:基因不相关的棉顶狨猴会优先将食物给予那些会无私回馈食物的个体。

Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back.

作者信息

Hauser Marc D, Chen M Keith, Chen Frances, Chuang Emmeline

机构信息

Department of Psychology, and Programme in Neurosciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 22;270(1531):2363-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2509.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2003.2509
PMID:14667352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1691522/
Abstract

Altruistic food giving among genetically unrelated individuals is rare in nature. The few examples that exist suggest that when animals give food to unrelated others, they may do so on the basis of mutualistic or reciprocally altruistic relationships. We present the results of four experiments designed to tease apart the factors mediating food giving among genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus), a cooperatively breeding New World primate. In experiment 1 we show that individuals give significantly more food to a trained conspecific who unilaterally gives food than to a conspecific who unilaterally never gives food. The apparent contingency of the tamarins' food-giving behaviour motivated the design of experiments 2-4. Results from all three experiments show that altruistic food giving is mediated by prior acts of altruistic food giving by a conspecific. Specifically, tamarins do not give food to unrelated others when the food received in the past represents the by-product of another's selfish actions (experiments 2 and 3) or when a human experimenter gives them food (experiment 4) as did the unilateral altruist in experiment 1. By contrast, if one tamarin gives another food without obtaining any immediate benefit, then the recipient is more likely to give food in return. Overall, results show that tamarins altruistically give food to genetically unrelated conspecifics, discriminate between altruistic and selfish actions, and give more food to those who give food back. Tamarins therefore have the psychological capacity for reciprocally mediated altruism.

摘要

在自然界中,基因不相关的个体之间进行利他性食物给予的情况很少见。现有的少数例子表明,当动物给与非亲属其他个体食物时,它们可能是基于互利或互惠利他关系才这样做的。我们展示了四项实验的结果,这些实验旨在梳理出在基因不相关的棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus)之间介导食物给予行为的因素,棉顶狨是一种进行合作繁殖的新大陆灵长类动物。在实验1中,我们发现,与单方面从不给予食物的同种个体相比,个体显著更愿意给与经过训练、单方面给予食物的同种个体更多食物。狨猴食物给予行为的这种明显的偶然性促使了实验2 - 4的设计。所有这三项实验的结果都表明,利他性食物给予是由同种个体先前的利他性食物给予行为介导的。具体来说,当过去获得的食物代表另一个体自私行为的副产品时(实验2和3),或者当人类实验者像实验1中的单方面利他者那样给它们食物时(实验4),狨猴不会给与非亲属其他个体食物。相比之下,如果一只狨猴给另一只狨猴食物而没有获得任何直接利益,那么接受者更有可能回报以食物。总体而言,结果表明,狨猴会利他性地给与基因不相关的同种个体食物,区分利他行为和自私行为,并且会给那些回报食物的个体更多食物。因此,狨猴具有互惠介导利他行为的心理能力。

相似文献

1
Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back.给予他人:基因不相关的棉顶狨猴会优先将食物给予那些会无私回馈食物的个体。
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 22;270(1531):2363-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2509.
2
Captive cotton-top tamarins' (Saguinus oedipus oedipus) use of landmarks to localize hidden food items.圈养棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus oedipus)利用地标定位隐藏食物的行为。
Am J Primatol. 2009 Apr;71(4):316-23. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20654.
3
Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates.合作繁殖的棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus)不会给它们的长期配偶提供奖励。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):231-41. doi: 10.1037/a0015094.
4
Color discrimination by the cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus oedipus) and its relation to fruit coloration.棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus oedipus)的颜色辨别及其与果实颜色的关系。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1987;49(2):57-69. doi: 10.1159/000156309.
5
The relationship between problem solving and inhibitory control: cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus) performance on a reversed contingency task.问题解决与抑制控制之间的关系:棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)在反向 contingency 任务中的表现。 (注:这里“contingency”可能结合上下文有更准确的专业释义,比如“应急情况”“相依性”等,仅按字面翻译)
J Comp Psychol. 2002 Mar;116(1):39-50. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.116.1.39.
6
Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)中的捐赠回报和他人偏好。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Jul;13(4):663-70. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0309-x. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
7
Inhibitory control and response selection in problem solving: how cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) overcome a bias for selecting the larger quantity of food.问题解决中的抑制控制与反应选择:棉顶狨猴(僧面猴属)如何克服选择更多食物量的偏向
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Feb;119(1):78-89. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.1.78.
8
Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton-top tamarins.数字的进化基础:棉顶狨对数值大小的自发表征
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jul 22;270(1523):1441-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2414.
9
Food-sharing in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1990;54(1-2):34-45. doi: 10.1159/000156424.
10
Reconciliation in captive cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus), a cooperative breeding primate.圈养棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus)的合群行为,一种合作繁殖的灵长类动物。
Am J Primatol. 2009 Nov;71(11):895-900. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20721.

引用本文的文献

1
Rats play tit-for-tat instead of integrating social experience over multiple interactions.老鼠会以牙还牙,而不是在多次互动中整合社会经验。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 15;287(1918):20192423. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2423.
2
Detection of Impending Aggressive Outbursts in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders: Violence Clues from Dogs.检测精神病患者的即将发生的攻击性行为:来自犬类的暴力线索。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 21;9(1):17228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52940-w.
3
High mutual cooperation rates in rats learning reciprocal altruism: The role of payoff matrix.大鼠互惠利他行为学习中的高合作率:收益矩阵的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 2;14(1):e0204837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204837. eCollection 2019.
4
Impulsiveness does not prevent cooperation from emerging but reduces its occurrence: an experiment with zebra finches.冲动并不会阻止合作的出现,但会减少其发生的频率:以斑胸草雀为例的实验。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09072-w.
5
Working dogs cooperate among one another by generalised reciprocity.工作犬通过广义互惠进行相互合作。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 6;7:43867. doi: 10.1038/srep43867.
6
Clark's Nutcrackers () Flexibly Adapt Caching Behavior to a Cooperative Context.克拉克星鸦灵活地将贮藏行为适应于合作情境。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 25;7:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01643. eCollection 2016.
7
Co-action provides rational basis for the evolutionary success of Pavlovian strategies.共同作用为巴甫洛夫式策略的进化成功提供了合理依据。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 1;6:30831. doi: 10.1038/srep30831.
8
Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species.非人类物种亲社会行为实验研究中的关键问题。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Jul;19(4):679-705. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-0973-6. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.相关收益是合作的关键。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150084. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0084.
10
Coordinated vigilance provides evidence for direct reciprocity in coral reef fishes.协同警戒为珊瑚礁鱼类的直接互惠行为提供了证据。
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 25;5:14556. doi: 10.1038/srep14556.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of autoshaping in cooperative two-player games between starlings.自身塑造在椋鸟双人合作游戏中的作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):67-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-67.
2
Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.重复囚徒困境中的折扣与互惠
Science. 2002 Dec 13;298(5601):2216-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1078498.
3
Capuchin cognitive ecology: cooperation based on projected returns.卷尾猴认知生态学:基于预期回报的合作。
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(2):221-8. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00152-5.
4
Reputation helps solve the 'tragedy of the commons'.声誉有助于解决“公地悲剧”。
Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):424-6. doi: 10.1038/415424a.
5
The production and perception of long calls by cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus): acoustic analyses and playback experiments.棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus)长叫声的产生与感知:声学分析与回放实验
J Comp Psychol. 2001 Sep;115(3):258-71. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.3.258.
6
Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.最后通牒博弈中的公平与理性
Science. 2000 Sep 8;289(5485):1773-5. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1773.
7
Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys.棕色卷尾猴食物分享中的态度互惠
Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):253-261. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1471.
8
Payment for labour in monkeys.猴子的劳动报酬。
Nature. 2000 Apr 6;404(6778):563. doi: 10.1038/35007138.
9
The Raw and the Stolen. Cooking and the Ecology of Human Origins.《生食与盗食:烹饪与人类起源的生态学》
Curr Anthropol. 1999 Dec;40(5):567-594.
10
Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus oedipus.问题解决与功能设计特征:对棉顶狨猴(Saguinus oedipus oedipus)的实验
Anim Behav. 1999 Mar;57(3):565-582. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1032.