• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿心脏研究中父母决策评估:一项初步研究。

Assessment of parental decision-making in neonatal cardiac research: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2010 Feb;36(2):106-10. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.030676.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2009.030676
PMID:20133406
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess parental permission for a neonate's research participation using the MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR), specifically testing the components of understanding, appreciation, reasoning and choice.

STUDY DESIGN

Quantitative interviews using study-specific MacCAT-CR tools.

HYPOTHESIS

Parents of critically ill newborns would produce comparable MacCAT-CR scores to healthy adult controls despite the emotional stress of an infant with critical heart disease or the urgency of surgery. Parents of infants diagnosed prenatally would have higher MacCAT-CR scores than parents of infants diagnosed postnatally. There would be no difference in MacCAT-CR scores between parents with respect to gender or whether they did or did not permit research participation.

PARTICIPANTS

Parents of neonates undergoing cardiac surgery who had made decisions about research participation before their neonate's surgery.

METHODS

The MacCAT-CR.

RESULTS

35 parents (18 mothers; 17 fathers) of 24 neonates completed 55 interviews for one or more of three studies. Total scores: magnetic resonance imaging (mean 36.6, SD 7.71), genetics (mean 38.8, SD 3.44), heart rate variability (mean 37.7, SD 3.30). Parents generally scored higher than published subject populations and were comparable to published control populations with some exceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

The MacCAT-CR can be used to assess parental permission for neonatal research participation. Despite the stress of a critically ill neonate requiring surgery, parents were able to understand study-specific information and make informed decisions to permit their neonate's participation.

摘要

目的

使用麦克阿瑟临床研究能力评估工具(MacCAT-CR)评估新生儿参与研究的父母同意情况,特别是测试理解、欣赏、推理和选择的能力。

研究设计

使用特定于研究的 MacCAT-CR 工具进行定量访谈。

假设

尽管患有严重心脏病的婴儿的情绪压力或手术的紧迫性,患有危重新生儿的父母会产生与健康成人对照组相当的 MacCAT-CR 分数。与出生后诊断的婴儿的父母相比,产前诊断的婴儿的父母的 MacCAT-CR 分数会更高。父母的性别、是否允许研究参与不会对 MacCAT-CR 分数产生影响。

参与者

在新生儿手术前已对研究参与做出决定的正在接受心脏手术的新生儿的父母。

方法

MacCAT-CR。

结果

35 名新生儿的 24 名父母(18 名母亲;17 名父亲)完成了三个研究中的一个或多个研究的 55 次访谈。磁共振成像的总分(均值 36.6,标准差 7.71)、遗传学(均值 38.8,标准差 3.44)、心率变异性(均值 37.7,标准差 3.30)。父母的总得分普遍高于已发表的主题人群,与一些例外情况相比,与已发表的对照组人群相当。

结论

MacCAT-CR 可用于评估新生儿研究参与的父母同意情况。尽管需要手术的危重新生儿压力很大,但父母能够理解特定于研究的信息并做出知情决策,允许其新生儿参与。

相似文献

1
Assessment of parental decision-making in neonatal cardiac research: a pilot study.新生儿心脏研究中父母决策评估:一项初步研究。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Feb;36(2):106-10. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.030676.
2
What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research?哪些因素对父母做出关于新生儿研究的决策很重要?
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 May;90(3):F267-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.065078.
3
Parental perception of time and decision-making in neonatal research.父母对新生儿研究中时间和决策的认知。
J Perinatol. 2009 Jul;29(7):508-11. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.5. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
4
Parental decision-making in congenital heart disease.先天性心脏病中的家长决策
Cardiol Young. 2004 Jun;14(3):309-14. doi: 10.1017/S1047951104003099.
5
Neonatal research and the validity of informed consent obtained in the perinatal period.新生儿研究与围产期获得的知情同意的有效性。
J Perinatol. 2004 Jul;24(7):409-15. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211142.
6
Evaluation of the capacity of inpatients with chronic schizophrenia to provide informed consent for participation in clinical trials; use of the Hebrew version of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR).评估慢性精神分裂症住院患者参与临床试验时提供知情同意的能力;使用麦克阿瑟临床研究能力评估工具希伯来语版(MacCAT-CR)。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2012 Aug;14(8):470-4.
7
Accuracy of the MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR) for measuring children's competence to consent to clinical research.麦克阿瑟临床研究能力评估工具(MacCAT-CR)评估儿童同意参与临床研究能力的准确性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Dec;168(12):1147-53. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1694.
8
Life support decisions for extremely premature infants: report of a pilot study.极早产儿的生命支持决策:一项试点研究报告
J Pediatr Nurs. 2005 Oct;20(5):347-59. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2005.03.006.
9
What do parents think about enrolling their premature babies in several research studies?父母对于让他们的早产宝宝参加多项研究有什么看法?
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 May;90(3):F225-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.061986.
10
Children's consent and paediatric research: is it appropriate for healthy children to be the decision-makers in clinical research?儿童的同意与儿科研究:健康儿童在临床研究中成为决策者是否合适?
Arch Dis Child. 2008 May;93(5):379-83. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.118299. Epub 2007 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Aspects of Involving Adolescents in HIV Research: A Systematic Review of the Empiric Literature.涉及青少年参与 HIV 研究的伦理问题:实证文献的系统综述。
J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;262:113589. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113589. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
2
Vigilance in the Decision-Making Process Regarding Termination of Pregnancy Following Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease-Application of the 'Conflict Decision-Making Model'.先天性心脏病产前诊断后终止妊娠决策过程中的警惕性-“冲突决策模型”的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159137.
3
Understanding parents' decision-making on participation in clinical trials in children's heart surgery: a qualitative study.
理解父母在儿童心脏手术临床试验中参与决策的情况:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e044896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044896.
4
The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the empirical research.关于早产儿或患病新生儿临床试验同意书的伦理问题:实证研究的系统评价(框架综合)
Trials. 2015 Nov 4;16:502. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0957-x.
5
Perceptions of academic health science research center personnel regarding informed consent processes and therapeutic misconception.学术健康科学研究中心人员对知情同意过程和治疗误解的看法。
Account Res. 2014;21(5):300-14. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.861328.
6
Parental permission and child assent in research on children.在儿童研究中获得父母同意和儿童同意。
Yale J Biol Med. 2013 Sep 20;86(3):291-301. eCollection 2013 Sep.
7
Challenges and successes of recruitment in the "angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in infants with single ventricle trial" of the Pediatric Heart Network.儿科心脏网络“单心室婴儿血管紧张素转换酶抑制试验”中的招募挑战与成功经验
Cardiol Young. 2013 Apr;23(2):248-57. doi: 10.1017/S1047951112000832. Epub 2012 Jul 5.