Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Methods and Public Health, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Dec;168(12):1147-53. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1694.
An objective assessment of children's competence to consent to research participation is currently not possible. Age limits for asking children's consent vary considerably between countries, and, to our knowledge, the correlation between competence and children's age has never been systematically investigated.
To test a standardized competence assessment instrument for children by modifying the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR), to investigate its reliability and validity, and to examine the correlation of its assessment with age and estimate cutoff ages.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective study included children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years in the inpatient and outpatient departments of allergology, gastroenterology, oncology, ophthalmology, and pulmonology from January 1, 2012, through January 1, 2014. Participants were eligible for clinical research studies, including observational studies and randomized clinical trials.
Competence judgments by experts aware of the 4 relevant criteria-understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and choice-were used to establish the reference standard. The index test was the MacCAT-CR, which used a semistructured interview format.
Interrater reliability, validity, and dimensionality of the MacCAT-CR and estimated cutoff ages for competence.
Of 209 eligible patients, we included 161 (mean age, 10.6 years; 47.2% male). Good reproducibility of MacCAT-CR total and subscale scores was observed (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.68-0.92). We confirmed unidimensionality of the MacCAT-CR. By the reference standard, we judged 54 children (33.5%) to be incompetent; by the MacCAT-CR, 61 children (37.9%). Criterion-related validity of MacCAT-CR scores was supported by high overall accuracy in correctly classifying children as competent against the reference standard (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.78). Age was a good predictor of competence on the MacCAT-CR (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.90). In children younger than 9.6 years, competence was unlikely (sensitivity, 90%); in those older than 11.2 years, competence was probable (specificity, 90%). The optimal cutoff age was 10.4 years (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 84%).
The MacCAT-CR demonstrated strong psychometric properties. In children aged 9.6 to 11.2 years, consent may be justified when competence can be demonstrated in individual cases by the MacCAT-CR. The results contribute to a scientific underpinning of regulations for clinical research directed toward children.
目前,无法对儿童同意参与研究的能力进行客观评估。各国对儿童同意年龄的限制差异很大,据我们所知,能力与儿童年龄之间的相关性从未被系统地研究过。
通过修改麦克阿瑟临床研究能力评估工具(MacCAT-CR)来测试儿童的标准化能力评估工具,研究其可靠性和有效性,并检验其评估与年龄的相关性,并估计临界年龄。
设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性研究包括 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 1 月 1 日期间,过敏、胃肠病、肿瘤、眼科和肺病学住院和门诊部门的 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年。参与者有资格参加临床研究,包括观察性研究和随机临床试验。
熟悉 4 个相关标准(理解、欣赏、推理和选择)的专家进行能力判断,作为参考标准。指标测试是 MacCAT-CR,它使用半结构化访谈格式。
MacCAT-CR 的评分者间信度、效度和维度以及能力的估计临界年龄。
在 209 名符合条件的患者中,我们纳入了 161 名(平均年龄 10.6 岁;47.2%为男性)。MacCAT-CR 总分和分量表评分的重现性良好(组内相关系数范围为 0.68-0.92)。我们证实了 MacCAT-CR 的一维性。根据参考标准,我们判断 54 名儿童(33.5%)为无能力;根据 MacCAT-CR,61 名儿童(37.9%)为无能力。MacCAT-CR 评分的标准相关效度得到了支持,因为它在正确分类儿童对参考标准的能力方面具有较高的总体准确性(接收者操作特征曲线下面积,0.78)。年龄是 MacCAT-CR 上能力的良好预测指标(接收者操作特征曲线下面积,0.90)。在 9.6 岁以下的儿童中,能力不太可能(敏感性,90%);在 11.2 岁以上的儿童中,能力很可能(特异性,90%)。最佳临界年龄为 10.4 岁(敏感性,81%;特异性,84%)。
MacCAT-CR 具有较强的心理测量特性。在 9.6 至 11.2 岁的儿童中,如果 MacCAT-CR 能够在个别情况下证明能力,那么同意可能是合理的。该结果有助于为针对儿童的临床研究法规提供科学依据。