• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短信确认招募后的知情同意。

Post-recruitment confirmation of informed consent by SMS.

机构信息

HØKH, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Mail drawer 95, Lørenskog 1478, Norway.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2010 Feb;36(2):126-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033456.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2009.033456
PMID:20133410
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To allow patients to reflect about a decision to participate in a clinical trial, guidelines suggest a 24-h delay from when they are informed about the trial to when they give consent. In certain clinical settings, this is likely to hamper recruitment.

METHOD

After oral and written information about the trial has been given in person, the patient signs the declaration of consent knowing that they will be asked again after 24 h whether they confirm or regret the decision. This procedure can be done by SMS. The investigators must document the response. The procedure was tried in a study in which the doctors were randomly assigned to receive a clinical communication skills course, and encounters with patients were videotaped before and after the course.

RESULTS

553 patients were approached, 530 (95.8%) gave initial consent, eight of these later regretted their consent.

DISCUSSION

The low level of regrets suggests this is an acceptable procedure for patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The RCT was registered before initiation - registration # ISRCTN22153332.

摘要

背景

为了让患者有时间思考是否参与临床试验,指南建议从告知患者有关试验信息到其同意参与的时间间隔为 24 小时。但在某些临床环境下,这可能会影响招募效果。

方法

在进行口头和书面的试验信息告知后,患者会签署同意书,而他们将在 24 小时后再次被询问是否确认或后悔该决定。该程序可以通过短信完成。调查人员必须记录回复。该程序已在一项研究中进行尝试,在该研究中,医生被随机分配接受临床沟通技巧课程,并且在课程前后对患者的就诊情况进行录像。

结果

共接触了 553 名患者,其中 530 名(95.8%)最初同意参与,其中 8 名后来后悔了他们的同意。

讨论

低后悔率表明这对患者来说是一种可接受的程序。

试验注册

该 RCT 在开始前进行了注册-注册号为 ISRCTN22153332。

相似文献

1
Post-recruitment confirmation of informed consent by SMS.短信确认招募后的知情同意。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Feb;36(2):126-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033456.
2
What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.我们的患者对他们的试验参与有何了解?评估患者对随机临床试验知情同意咨询的理解。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):74-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.035485. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
3
I don't like that, it's tricking people too much...: acute informed consent to participation in a trial of thrombolysis for stroke.我不喜欢那样,它太会欺骗人了……:急性中风溶栓治疗试验的知情同意
J Med Ethics. 2008 Oct;34(10):751-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023168.
4
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.理解癌症临床试验参与者参与研究的决策:与知情同意、患者满意度和决策后悔相关的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
5
Testing an alternate informed consent process.测试一种替代的知情同意程序。
Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):135-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c3df5.
6
Recruitment of subjects for clinical trials after informed consent: does gender and educational status make a difference?在获得知情同意后招募临床试验受试者:性别和教育程度会产生影响吗?
J Postgrad Med. 2003 Apr-Jun;49(2):109-13.
7
Using decision aids may improve informed consent for research.使用决策辅助工具可能会提高研究的知情同意。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 May;31(3):218-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
8
Voluntary informed consent in research and clinical care: an update.研究与临床医疗中的自愿知情同意:最新情况
Pain Pract. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):446-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00241.x.
9
Patients' perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: a Danish study.急性心肌梗死研究中患者对知情同意的认知:一项丹麦研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2313-24. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.023.
10
[A modified informed-consent procedure in which the complete information is given retrospectively: no objection from participating patients].一种修改后的知情同意程序,即回顾性地提供完整信息:参与的患者无异议
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Jan 1;149(1):29-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in informed consent decision-making in Korean clinical research: A participant perspective.知情同意决策在韩国临床研究中面临的挑战:以参与者视角。
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0216889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216889. eCollection 2019.
2
Clinical decisions presented to patients in hospital encounters: a cross-sectional study using a novel taxonomy.医院诊疗过程中向患者提出的临床决策:一项使用新型分类法的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 5;8(1):e018042. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018042.
3
What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study.
什么是医疗决策?基于医院就诊中医师陈述的分类法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 11;6(2):e010098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010098.