Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2010;44(1):27-33. doi: 10.3233/CH-2010-1248.
Hemorheologic factors such as red blood cell (RBC) aggregation and deformability differ according to species. In many comparative hemorheologic studies, only venous blood samples have been used for measurements. There is little published information comparing arterial and venous blood differences between species. We compared hemorheologic factors in arterial and venous blood in rats, dogs and humans.
Nineteen dogs and 12 rats were used. Human blood was obtained from 12 healthy volunteers. Blood gas analysis, hematocrit and elongation index which represents RBC deformability were measured in arterial and venous blood samples. The critical shear stress and aggregation index, both of which represent RBC aggregation, were also measured in arterial and venous blood.
There were no arterial or venous differences in hematocrit, critical shear stress, or elongation index in dogs. In rats, RBC aggregation was not measurable. The hematocrit and elongation index of arterial blood were significantly lower than those of venous blood in rats. There were no arterial or venous differences in hematocrit, aggregation index, or elongation index in humans.
Arterial and venous hemorheologic factors differed depending on the species. Further standardization is necessary for the measurement of hemorheologic variables.
红细胞(RBC)聚集和变形等血液流变学因素因物种而异。在许多比较血液流变学研究中,仅使用静脉血样进行测量。关于物种之间动脉血和静脉血差异的信息很少见诸于文献。我们比较了大鼠、犬和人动脉血和静脉血的血液流变学因素。
使用了 19 只狗和 12 只大鼠。从 12 名健康志愿者中获得人血。在动脉和静脉血样中测量血气分析、血细胞比容和代表 RBC 变形性的伸长指数。还测量了代表 RBC 聚集的临界剪切应力和聚集指数。
狗的血细胞比容、临界剪切应力或伸长指数在动脉和静脉之间没有差异。在大鼠中,无法测量 RBC 聚集。大鼠动脉血的血细胞比容和伸长指数明显低于静脉血。人的血细胞比容、聚集指数或伸长指数在动脉和静脉之间没有差异。
动脉和静脉血液流变学因素因物种而异。血液流变学变量的测量需要进一步标准化。