• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于乳糜泻筛查的新旧血清学检测方法。

Old and new serological tests for celiac disease screening.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, St Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;4(1):31-5. doi: 10.1586/egh.09.66.

DOI:10.1586/egh.09.66
PMID:20136587
Abstract

Evaluation of: Lewis NR, Scott BB. Meta-analysis: deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody and tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody compared as screening test for celiac disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 31(1), 73-81 (2010). In celiac disease (CD), deamidation of gliadin peptides, induced by tissue transglutaminase (tTG), generates novel antigenic epitopes evoking a specific immune response. Serological tests based on the detection of antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) have been developed with very promising results in terms of sensitivity and specificity for CD screening. In the present study, a meta-analysis of studies published from 1998 to 2008 was designed to compare the performance of DGP antibodies with that of tTG antibodies, the validated and routinely employed test for CD screening. The authors have limited their analysis to IgA class antibodies underlining that most of the considered studies had methodological imperfections, especially ascertainment bias. The results of this meta-analysis indicated that the pooled sensitivities for DGP and tTG antibodies were 87.8% (95% CI: 85.6-89.9) and 93% (95% CI: 91.2-94.5), respectively, and the pooled specificities were 94.1% (95%CI: 92.5-95.5) and 96.5% (95% CI: 95.2-97.5), respectively. In summary, although both tests represent a very good tool for identifying celiac patients, tTG antibodies display a higher predictive value than DGP antibodies, and must still be considered the best serological test for CD screening.

摘要

评价

Lewis NR, Scott BB. Meta 分析:脱酰胺麦胶蛋白肽(DGP)抗体和组织转谷氨酰胺酶(tTG)抗体比较作为乳糜泻的筛查试验。《胃肠病药理学与治疗学》31(1), 73-81 (2010)。在乳糜泻(CD)中,组织转谷氨酰胺酶(tTG)诱导的麦胶蛋白肽脱酰胺会产生新的抗原表位,引发特异性免疫反应。基于检测脱酰胺麦胶蛋白肽(DGP)抗体的血清学检测已被开发出来,在 CD 筛查的敏感性和特异性方面取得了非常有前景的结果。在本研究中,设计了一项对 1998 年至 2008 年发表的研究进行的荟萃分析,以比较 DGP 抗体和 tTG 抗体的性能,后者是验证和常规用于 CD 筛查的检测方法。作者将他们的分析限于 IgA 类抗体,强调大多数考虑的研究存在方法学缺陷,特别是确认偏倚。该荟萃分析的结果表明,DGP 和 tTG 抗体的汇总敏感性分别为 87.8%(95% CI: 85.6-89.9)和 93%(95% CI: 91.2-94.5),汇总特异性分别为 94.1%(95%CI: 92.5-95.5)和 96.5%(95% CI: 95.2-97.5)。总之,尽管这两种检测都代表了识别乳糜泻患者的非常好的工具,但 tTG 抗体显示出比 DGP 抗体更高的预测价值,并且仍然被认为是 CD 筛查的最佳血清学检测。

相似文献

1
Old and new serological tests for celiac disease screening.用于乳糜泻筛查的新旧血清学检测方法。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;4(1):31-5. doi: 10.1586/egh.09.66.
2
Antibodies against synthetic deamidated gliadin peptides and tissue transglutaminase for the identification of childhood celiac disease.用于儿童乳糜泻诊断的抗合成脱酰胺麦醇溶蛋白肽和组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Nov;5(11):1276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.05.024. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
3
Serologic screening for celiac disease in children: a comparison between established assays and tests with deamidated gliadin-derived peptides plus conjugates for both IgA and IgG antibodies.儿童乳糜泻的血清学筛查:既定检测方法与使用脱酰胺麦醇溶蛋白衍生肽加IgA和IgG抗体缀合物的检测方法的比较
APMIS. 2009 Nov;117(11):808-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2009.02541.x.
4
Comparison of commercially available serologic kits for the detection of celiac disease.用于检测乳糜泻的市售血清学试剂盒的比较。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;43(3):225-32. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31816200e5.
5
Natural history of antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides and transglutaminase in early childhood celiac disease.儿童乳糜泻中脱酰胺麦醇溶蛋白肽和转谷氨酰胺酶抗体的自然史
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007 Sep;45(3):293-300. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31806c7b34.
6
New screening tests enrich anti-transglutaminase results and support a highly sensitive two-test based strategy for celiac disease diagnosis.新的筛查试验丰富了抗转谷氨酰胺酶的结果,并支持基于两种高度敏感试验的乳糜泻诊断策略。
Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Aug 17;412(17-18):1662-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.05.024. Epub 2011 May 25.
7
Antibodies against deamidated gliadin as new and accurate biomarkers of childhood coeliac disease.抗脱酰胺麦醇溶蛋白抗体作为儿童乳糜泻新的精准生物标志物
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009 Jul;49(1):52-8. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318195dae3.
8
Performance of deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies as first screening for celiac disease in the general pediatric population.脱酰胺麦醇溶蛋白肽抗体在普通儿科人群中作为乳糜泻初筛的性能。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Nov 21;11:1279825. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1279825. eCollection 2023.
9
Assessment of a combination screening assay for celiac disease.乳糜泻联合筛查检测方法的评估
Auto Immun Highlights. 2011 May 19;2(2):67-71. doi: 10.1007/s13317-011-0020-1. eCollection 2011 Nov.
10
Meta-analysis: deamidated gliadin peptide antibody and tissue transglutaminase antibody compared as screening tests for coeliac disease.荟萃分析:对比脱酰胺麦胶蛋白肽抗体和组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体作为乳糜泻的筛查试验。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan;31(1):73-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04110.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Elevated Total Serum Immunoglobulin A Levels in Patients with Suspicion for Celiac Disease.疑似乳糜泻患者血清总免疫球蛋白A水平升高
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 3;12(15):5101. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155101.
2
The role of serology in the diagnosis of coeliac disease.血清学在乳糜泻诊断中的作用。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023;16(2):118-128. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2713.
3
Osteoporosis and Celiac Disease: Updates and Hidden Pitfalls.骨质疏松症与乳糜泻:最新进展与潜在误区。
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 22;15(5):1089. doi: 10.3390/nu15051089.
4
Introducing New Potential Biomarkers for Celiac Disease among the Genes Extracted from General Databases.从通用数据库提取的基因中发现乳糜泻的新潜在生物标志物。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2022 Apr;14(2):192-199. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2022.272. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
5
Type 2 Transglutaminase in Coeliac Disease: A Key Player in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapy.2 型转谷氨酰胺酶在乳糜泻中的作用:发病机制、诊断和治疗的关键因素。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 6;23(14):7513. doi: 10.3390/ijms23147513.
6
Transient Small-Bowel Intussusception Unmasking Adult Celiac Disease.短暂性小肠套叠揭示成人乳糜泻
Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 14;16(1):44-48. doi: 10.1159/000521542. eCollection 2022 Jan-Apr.
7
Risk of Drop-Out from Follow-Up Evaluations for Celiac Disease: Is It Similar for All Patients?乳糜泻随访评估失访风险:所有患者都相似吗?
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 14;14(6):1223. doi: 10.3390/nu14061223.
8
Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis.当前乳糜泻管理指南:系统评价与比较分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 7;28(1):154-175. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.154.
9
Intestinal Microbiota in Common Chronic Inflammatory Disorders Affecting Children.儿童常见慢性炎症性疾病中的肠道微生物群。
Front Immunol. 2021 Jun 7;12:642166. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.642166. eCollection 2021.
10
Celiac disease: histology-differential diagnosis-complications. A practical approach.乳糜泻:组织病理学-鉴别诊断-并发症。实用方法。
Pathologica. 2020 Sep;112(3):186-196. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-157.