Department of Biomedical Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Brooklyn Square, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Med Hypotheses. 2010 May;74(5):911-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.05.039. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
Previous reports of specific patterns of increased fragility at common chromosomal fragile sites (CFS) found in association with certain neurobehavioural disorders did not attract attention at the time due to a shift towards molecular approaches to delineate neuropsychiatric disorder candidate genes. Links with miRNA, altered methylation and the origin of copy number variation indicate that CFS region characteristics may be part of chromatinomic mechanisms that are increasingly linked with neuroplasticity and memory. Current reports of large-scale double-stranded DNA breaks in differentiating neurons and evidence of ongoing DNA demethylation of specific gene promoters in adult hippocampus may shed new light on the dynamic epigenetic changes that are increasingly appreciated as contributing to long-term memory consolidation. The expression of immune recombination activating genes in key stress-induced memory regions suggests the adoption by the brain of this ancient pattern recognition and memory system to establish a structural basis for long-term memory through controlled chromosomal breakage at highly specific genomic regions. It is furthermore considered that these mechanisms for management of epigenetic information related to stress memory could be linked, in some instances, with the transfer of the somatically acquired information to the germline. Here, rearranged sequences can be subjected to further selection and possible eventual retrotranscription to become part of the more stable coding machinery if proven to be crucial for survival and reproduction. While linkage of cognitive memory with stress and fear circuitry and memory establishment through structural DNA modification is proposed as a normal process, inappropriate activation of immune-like genomic rearrangement processes through traumatic stress memory may have the potential to lead to undesirable activation of neuro-inflammatory processes. These theories could have a significant impact on the interpretation of risks posed by heredity and the environment and the search for neuropsychiatric candidate genes.
先前有报道称,某些神经行为障碍与特定染色体脆弱部位(CFS)的脆性增加模式有关,但由于当时人们倾向于采用分子方法来确定神经精神障碍候选基因,这些发现并未引起关注。miRNA、甲基化改变以及拷贝数变异的起源表明,CFS 区域的特征可能是染色质组学机制的一部分,这些机制与神经可塑性和记忆越来越相关。目前关于分化神经元中大规模双链 DNA 断裂的报道以及成年海马体中特定基因启动子持续去甲基化的证据,可能为越来越被认为有助于长期记忆巩固的动态表观遗传变化提供新的认识。免疫重组激活基因在关键应激诱导记忆区域的表达表明,大脑采用了这种古老的模式识别和记忆系统,通过在高度特异性的基因组区域控制染色体断裂来建立长期记忆的结构基础。此外,人们认为与应激记忆相关的表观遗传信息管理机制可能在某些情况下与体细胞获得的信息向生殖系的转移有关。在这里,重排序列可以进一步进行选择,并且如果被证明对生存和繁殖至关重要,则可能最终逆转录成为更稳定的编码机制的一部分。虽然将认知记忆与应激和恐惧回路联系起来,并通过结构 DNA 修饰来建立记忆被认为是一个正常过程,但通过创伤性应激记忆过度激活类似于免疫的基因组重排过程,可能有潜在的导致神经炎症过程的不适当激活。这些理论可能对解释遗传和环境带来的风险以及寻找神经精神障碍候选基因产生重大影响。