• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉评估整体和节段左心室功能的可靠性:以色列超声心动图研究组的一项多中心研究。

Reliability of visual assessment of global and segmental left ventricular function: a multicenter study by the Israeli Echocardiography Research Group.

机构信息

Hillel-Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.

出版信息

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Mar;23(3):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.12.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2009.12.020
PMID:20138473
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the reliability of visual assessments of segmental wall motion (WM) abnormalities and global left ventricular function among highly experienced echocardiographers using contemporary echocardiographic technology in patients with a variety of cardiac conditions.

METHODS

The reliability of visual determinations of left ventricular WM and global function was calculated from assessments made by 12 experienced echocardiographers on 105 echocardiograms recorded using contemporary echocardiographic equipment. Ten studies were reread independently to determine intraobserver reliability.

RESULTS

Interobserver reliability for visual differentiation between normal, hypokinetic, and akinetic segments had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.70. The intraclass correlation coefficient for dichotomizing segments into normal versus other abnormal was 0.63, for hypokinetic versus other scores was 0.26, and for akinetic versus other scores was 0.58. Similar results were found for intraobserver reliability. Interobserver reliability for WM score index was 0.84 and for left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.78. Similar values were obtained for the intraobserver reliability of WM score index and ejection fraction. Compared to angiographic data, the accuracy of segmental WM assessments was 85%, and correct determination of the culprit artery was achieved in 59% of patients with myocardial infarctions.

CONCLUSION

Among experienced readers using contemporary echocardiographic equipment, interobserver and intraobserver reliability was reasonable for the visual quantification of normal and akinetic segments but poor for hypokinetic segments. Reliability was good for the visual assessment of global left ventricular function by WM score index and ejection fraction.

摘要

背景

本多中心研究的目的是确定在使用现代超声心动图设备的情况下,具有丰富经验的超声心动图医师对各种心脏疾病患者的节段性壁运动(WM)异常和整体左心室功能进行视觉评估的可靠性。

方法

12 名经验丰富的超声心动图医师对 105 份使用现代超声心动图设备记录的超声心动图进行评估,计算视觉评估左心室 WM 和整体功能的可靠性。对 10 份研究进行独立重读,以确定观察者内可靠性。

结果

观察者间视觉区分正常、低运动和无运动节段的可靠性的组内相关系数为 0.70。将节段分为正常与其他异常的二分类,其组内相关系数为 0.63,将节段分为低运动与其他评分的组内相关系数为 0.26,将节段分为无运动与其他评分的组内相关系数为 0.58。观察者内可靠性也得到了类似的结果。WM 评分指数和左心室射血分数的观察者间可靠性分别为 0.84 和 0.78。WM 评分指数和射血分数的观察者内可靠性也得到了类似的值。与血管造影数据相比,节段 WM 评估的准确性为 85%,心肌梗死患者中 59%正确确定了罪犯动脉。

结论

在使用现代超声心动图设备的经验丰富的读者中,视觉定量正常和无运动节段的观察者间和观察者内可靠性是合理的,但低运动节段的可靠性较差。WM 评分指数和射血分数的视觉评估对整体左心室功能的可靠性较好。

相似文献

1
Reliability of visual assessment of global and segmental left ventricular function: a multicenter study by the Israeli Echocardiography Research Group.视觉评估整体和节段左心室功能的可靠性:以色列超声心动图研究组的一项多中心研究。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Mar;23(3):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.12.020.
2
Three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography for automatic assessment of global and regional left ventricular function based on area strain.基于面积应变的三维斑点追踪超声心动图自动评估整体和局部左心室功能。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Mar;24(3):314-21. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.014.
3
A new tool for automatic assessment of segmental wall motion based on longitudinal 2D strain: a multicenter study by the Israeli Echocardiography Research Group.一种基于纵向二维应变的节段性壁运动自动评估新工具:以色列超声心动图研究组的多中心研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jan;3(1):47-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.841874. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
4
Contrast echocardiography is superior to tissue harmonics for assessment of left ventricular function in mechanically ventilated patients.在评估机械通气患者的左心室功能方面,对比超声心动图优于组织谐波成像。
Am Heart J. 2000 Aug;140(2):291-6. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.107175.
5
Use of an automatic application for wall motion classification based on longitudinal strain: is it affected by operator expertise in echocardiography? A multicentre study by the Israeli Echocardiography Research Group.基于纵向应变的自动壁运动分类应用的使用:它是否受超声心动图操作人员专业知识的影响?以色列超声心动图研究组的一项多中心研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Mar;13(3):257-62. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer182. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
6
Real-time quantitative automatic assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion by speckle imaging.通过斑点成像对左心室射血分数和室壁节段运动进行实时定量自动评估。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Apr;9(4):281-5.
7
Analysis of myocardial deformation based on pixel tracking in two dimensional echocardiographic images enables quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular function.基于二维超声心动图图像中像素追踪的心肌变形分析能够对局部左心室功能进行定量评估。
Heart. 2006 Aug;92(8):1102-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.077107. Epub 2005 Dec 30.
8
Quantitative evaluation of regional left ventricular function by multidetector computed tomography.多排螺旋计算机断层扫描对左心室局部功能的定量评估
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Mar-Apr;33(2):204-10. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181772731.
9
Validation of gated blood-pool SPECT regional left ventricular function measurements.门控心血池单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)区域左心室功能测量的验证
J Nucl Med. 2009 Jan;50(1):53-60. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.056085. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
10
Improved interobserver variability and accuracy of echocardiographic visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment through a self-directed learning program using cardiac magnetic resonance images.通过使用心脏磁共振图像的自我指导学习计划,提高超声心动图视觉左心室射血分数评估的观察者间变异性和准确性。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Nov;26(11):1267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A graphical analysis of aspects contributing to the spreading of measurements of left ventricular function.左心室功能测量值传播因素的图形分析。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 May;39(5):915-927. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02796-z. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
Agreement between visually estimated left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography and quantitative measurements using cardiac magnetic resonance.超声心动图目测左心室射血分数与心脏磁共振定量测量的一致性。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2022 Feb;26(2):127-132. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.367.
3
Heart failure with mid-range or mildly reduced ejection fraction.
射血分数中间值或轻度降低的心力衰竭。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Feb;19(2):100-116. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00605-5. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
4
Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes.临床表型分组比左心室射血分数分类更能有效分层心力衰竭结局。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):2741-2754. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13344. Epub 2021 May 2.
5
Focused cardiac ultrasound in preoperative assessment: the perioperative provider's new stethoscope?术前评估中的心脏聚焦超声:围手术期医护人员的新型听诊器?
Perioper Med (Lond). 2019 Nov 22;8:16. doi: 10.1186/s13741-019-0129-8. eCollection 2019.
6
Regional dynamics of fractal dimension of the left ventricular endocardium from cine computed tomography images.基于电影计算机断层扫描图像的左心室内膜分形维数的区域动力学
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Oct;6(4):046002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.4.046002. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
7
The continuous heart failure spectrum: moving beyond an ejection fraction classification.连续心力衰竭谱:超越射血分数分类。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(26):2155-2163. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz158.
8
Subjective right ventricle assessment by echo qualified intensive care specialists: assessing agreement with objective measures.超声重症监护专家对主观右心室评估:评估与客观测量的一致性。
Crit Care. 2019 Mar 7;23(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2375-z.
9
The Association of Radial Artery Pulse Wave Variables with the Pulse Wave Velocity and Echocardiographic Parameters in Hypertension.高血压患者桡动脉脉搏波变量与脉搏波速度及超声心动图参数的相关性
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Dec 2;2018:5291759. doi: 10.1155/2018/5291759. eCollection 2018.
10
Cardiac Index by Transthoracic Echocardiography (CITE) study.经胸超声心动图(CITE)研究的心脏指数。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0207269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207269. eCollection 2018.