Lomas J, Enkin M, Anderson G M, Hannah W J, Vayda E, Singer J
Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2202-7.
A randomized controlled trial with 76 physicians in 16 community hospitals evaluated audit and feedback and local opinion leader education as methods of encouraging compliance with a guideline for the management of women with a previous cesarean section. The guideline recommended clinical actions to increase trial of labor and vaginal birth rates. Charts for all 3552 cases in the study groups were audited. After 24 months the trial of labor and vaginal birth rates in the audit and feedback group were no different from those in the control group, but rates were 46% and 85% higher, respectively, among physicians educated by an opinion leader. Duration of hospital stay was lower in the opinion leader education group than in the other two groups. The overall cesarean section rate was reduced only in the opinion leader education group. There were no adverse clinical outcomes attributable to the interventions. The use of opinion leaders improved the quality of care.
一项针对16家社区医院的76名医生开展的随机对照试验,评估了审核与反馈以及当地意见领袖教育作为鼓励遵循既往剖宫产女性管理指南的方法。该指南推荐了提高试产和阴道分娩率的临床措施。对研究组中所有3552例病例的病历进行了审核。24个月后,审核与反馈组的试产率和阴道分娩率与对照组无异,但在接受意见领袖教育的医生中,这两个比率分别高出46%和85%。意见领袖教育组的住院时间比其他两组短。仅意见领袖教育组的总体剖宫产率有所降低。干预措施未导致不良临床结局。意见领袖的使用提高了护理质量。