Institute of Clinical Education, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Portland Square, Devon, UK.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Oct;15(4):573-85. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9220-0. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
Developments in clinical education have recently challenged the identity of anatomy teaching and learning, leading to high profile debate over the potential implications for the competence levels of new doctors. However, the emphasis remains on methods of teaching, rather than a review of what well-rounded anatomical learning actually entails, and how teaching can address contemporary learning needs. This paper identifies and addresses some of these issues, drawing on expert views captured in qualitative research with anatomy tutors at twenty different medical schools in the UK. Three main themes emerging from our analysis are described: anatomy as a subject matter, the challenges of teaching or learning anatomy, and the use of teaching methods. We also detail how inductive analysis generated new hypotheses worthy of further consideration. These fall into two key categories: (1) improving anatomy curriculum design and (2) advancing anatomy education research.
临床教育的发展最近对解剖教学的身份提出了挑战,导致了一场关于新医生能力水平潜在影响的高姿态辩论。然而,重点仍然是教学方法,而不是对全面的解剖学习实际需要什么以及教学如何满足当代学习需求的回顾。本文通过对英国 20 所医学院的解剖学教师进行的定性研究,确定并解决了其中的一些问题。我们的分析中出现了三个主要主题:解剖学作为一门学科、教学或学习解剖学的挑战以及教学方法的使用。我们还详细介绍了如何通过归纳分析产生值得进一步考虑的新假设。这些假设分为两类:(1) 改进解剖学课程设计,(2) 推进解剖学教育研究。