• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮下引流管(Redon drains)并不能降低剖腹手术后手术部位感染的发生率。一项针对 200 名患者的随机对照试验。

Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients.

机构信息

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 May;25(5):639-43. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0884-y. Epub 2010 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-010-0884-y
PMID:20140620
Abstract

PURPOSE

Surgical site infections (SSI) cause excess morbidity and mortality in modern surgery. Several different approaches to reduce the incidence of SSI have been investigated with variable results.

METHOD

This is to our knowledge the first systematic randomized evaluation in patients undergoing laparotomy in visceral surgery to clarify whether widely used subcutaneous drains (Redon) affect wound infection as the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

In 200 patients, we were unable to show a statistically significant impact on the postoperative healing process in patients with the full variety of abdominal surgical interventions. Overall, we observed surgical site infection in 9.5% of all patients (n = 19), of these n = 9 (47.4%) were in the control group without a drain, and 10 (52.6%) were in the experimental group with a Redon drain (not significant).

CONCLUSION

As this study could not demonstrate a reduction of SSI by the use of Redon drains, there is no indication for prophylactic subcutaneous suction drains after laparotomy.

摘要

目的

手术部位感染(SSI)会给现代外科手术带来过多的发病率和死亡率。已经研究了几种不同的方法来降低 SSI 的发生率,但结果各不相同。

方法

这是我们所知的首例针对内脏外科剖腹手术患者的系统随机评估,旨在明确广泛使用的皮下引流管(雷顿管)是否会影响伤口感染作为主要观察指标。

结果

在 200 名患者中,我们无法证明在接受各种腹部外科干预的患者的术后愈合过程中具有统计学意义的影响。总体而言,我们观察到所有患者中有 9.5%(n=19)发生了手术部位感染,其中 n=9(47.4%)在无引流管的对照组中,n=10(52.6%)在有雷顿引流管的实验组中(无显著差异)。

结论

由于本研究未能证明使用雷顿引流管可降低 SSI 的发生率,因此剖腹术后不建议预防性使用皮下抽吸引流管。

相似文献

1
Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients.皮下引流管(Redon drains)并不能降低剖腹手术后手术部位感染的发生率。一项针对 200 名患者的随机对照试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 May;25(5):639-43. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0884-y. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
2
Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.回肠造口术回纳术中皮下引流的必要性(DRASTAR)——一项随机对照双中心试验
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Jun;401(4):409-18. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1436-x. Epub 2016 May 1.
3
A randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous closed-suction Blake drains for the prevention of incisional surgical site infection after colorectal surgery.皮下封闭吸引式布雷克引流管预防结直肠手术后手术切口部位感染的随机对照试验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Mar;32(3):391-398. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2687-2. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
Subcutaneous vacuum drains reduce surgical site infection after primary closure of defunctioning ileostomy.皮下负压引流可降低功能性回肠造口一期关闭术后手术部位感染的发生率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;30(7):977-82. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2168-z. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
5
Abdominal wound closure in the presence of sepsis: our experience with the use of subcutaneous drain.腹腔感染时的腹壁缝合:我们使用皮下引流的经验。
Ghana Med J. 2024 Mar;58(1):26-33. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v58i1.5.
6
Efficacy and safety of two post-operative drains: results of a prospectively randomized clinical study in breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery.两种术后引流管的疗效和安全性:保乳手术后乳腺癌患者前瞻性随机临床试验结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Dec;300(6):1687-1692. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05360-0. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
7
Subcutaneous suction drains do not prevent surgical site infections in clean-contaminated abdominal surgery-results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.皮下引流管并不能预防清洁污染腹部手术的手术部位感染——系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Sep;404(6):663-668. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01813-x. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
[Complications and risks of suction drainage].[负压引流的并发症与风险]
Z Gesamte Hyg. 1990 Feb;36(2):94-9.
9
Subcutaneous closed-suction drainage does not affect surgical site infection rate following elective abdominal operations: a prospective randomized clinical trial.皮下闭式引流不影响择期腹部手术后手术部位感染率:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Acta Chir Belg. 2010 Jul-Aug;110(4):457-62. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2010.11680655.
10
Intraoperative wound irrigation to prevent surgical site infection after laparotomy (IOWISI): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开腹术后术中伤口冲洗预防手术部位感染(IOWISI):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Sep 4;18(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2154-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Bicycle impalement: A case series of penetrating handlebar injuries.自行车穿刺伤:一系列车把穿透伤病例
Trauma Case Rep. 2025 Apr 16;57:101163. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2025.101163. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Abdominal wound closure in the presence of sepsis: our experience with the use of subcutaneous drain.腹腔感染时的腹壁缝合:我们使用皮下引流的经验。
Ghana Med J. 2024 Mar;58(1):26-33. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v58i1.5.
3
Recent evidence for subcutaneous drains to prevent surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery.腹腔镜在消化外科手术中的应用与手术部位感染
Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):627-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181638609.
2
A prospective, randomised, controlled trial of the use of drains in total hip arthroplasty.一项关于全髋关节置换术中使用引流管的前瞻性、随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Oct;87(10):1397-401. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B10.16221.
3
[Closure under reduced atmospheric pressure of extensive wounds].[大面积伤口在减压状态下的闭合]
近期关于皮下引流预防腹部手术后手术部位感染的证据:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):2879-2889. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2879.
4
Hand port-site infection after hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for living-donor kidney transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.手助腹腔镜供肾切取术治疗活体供肾移植术后手端口感染:一项回顾性队列研究。
PeerJ. 2022 Oct 17;10:e14215. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14215. eCollection 2022.
5
Incision pressing, a simple and effective intervention to reduce colorectal surgical site infection: A propensity score-matched study.切口按压,一种减少结直肠手术部位感染的简单有效干预措施:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 26;9:917559. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.917559. eCollection 2022.
6
Modified subcutaneous suction drainage to prevent incisional surgical site infections after radical colorectal surgery.改良皮下负压引流预防结直肠癌根治术后手术切口部位感染
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Feb;9(2):910-917. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.32.
7
Efficacy of Subcutaneous Closed Suction Drain in Reduction of Postoperative Surgical Site Infection.皮下闭式吸引引流在降低术后手术部位感染中的疗效
Surg J (N Y). 2021 Oct 12;7(4):e275-e280. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735900. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
The Effectiveness of Superficial Drain to Reduce Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery.浅表引流在结直肠手术中降低手术部位感染的有效性
Cureus. 2021 Aug 16;13(8):e17232. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17232. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Letter to the Editor regarding "Prophylactic subcutaneous drainage reduces post-operative incisional infections in colorectal surgeries: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials".致编辑的信:关于“预防性皮下引流可降低结直肠手术术后切口感染率:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析”
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;36(11):2533-2534. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03964-0. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
10
Prophylactic subcutaneous drainage reduces post-operative incisional infections in colorectal surgeries: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.预防性皮下引流可降低结直肠手术后切口感染的风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Aug;36(8):1633-1642. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03908-8. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Mem Acad Chir (Paris). 1954;80(12-14):394-6.
4
Subcutaneous drainage versus no drainage after minilaparotomy in gynecologic benign conditions: a randomized study.妇科良性疾病小切口剖腹术后皮下引流与不引流的比较:一项随机研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;188(1):71-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.103.
5
Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.剖宫产术后皮下缝合与皮下引流预防伤口裂开的随机临床试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1119-23. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123823.
6
Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.择期正中剖腹手术中透热疗法与手术刀切口的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2001 Jan;88(1):41-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x.
7
Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.《手术部位感染预防指南》,1999年。疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)医院感染控制实践咨询委员会。
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96.
8
[Value of subcutaneous drainage in repair of primary inguinal hernia. A prospective randomized study of 100 cases].[皮下引流在原发性腹股沟疝修补术中的价值。100例前瞻性随机研究]
Chirurg. 1997 Jan;68(1):63-7. doi: 10.1007/s001040050151.
9
[Muscular changes caused by suction drainage. Scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, light microscopy and morphometric studies of dorsal muscles of the rat (Rattus rattus) using drainage].[负压引流引起的肌肉变化。使用引流对大鼠(褐家鼠)背部肌肉进行扫描电子显微镜、透射电子显微镜、光学显微镜及形态计量学研究]
Unfallchirurgie. 1983 Aug;9(4):223-8.
10
A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage.一项比较封闭式吸引与单纯导管引流的细菌学研究。
Am J Surg. 1984 Nov;148(5):618-20. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90336-2.