Senn Stephen
Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Biom J. 2010 Feb;52(1):85-94. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900074.
Some personal remarks about Hans van Houwelingen's approach to biostatistics in general are followed by a discussion of his article with Koos Zwinderman and Theo Stijnen outlining a bivariate approach to meta-analysis. It is concluded that this is more radical than many may realise in that it permits inter-trial information to be recovered. This has some advantages but in theory opens the door to bias. It is concluded that in practice the size of this bias is likely to be small. I end with some further personal remarks to Hans.
在对汉斯·范·豪韦林根一般的生物统计学方法发表了一些个人看法之后,接下来讨论了他与库斯·兹温德曼和西奥·斯蒂ijnen合写的一篇文章,该文章概述了一种用于荟萃分析的双变量方法。得出的结论是,这种方法比许多人意识到的更为激进,因为它允许恢复试验间的信息。这有一些优点,但理论上也为偏差打开了大门。得出的结论是,在实践中这种偏差的大小可能很小。最后我对汉斯又发表了一些个人看法。