Suppr超能文献

启动!自我能动性作为人类(智人)和猴子(猕猴)的判别线索。

Launch! Self-agency as a discriminative cue for humans (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Macaca Mulatta).

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Emory University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Sep;150(9):1901-1917. doi: 10.1037/xge0001026. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

Abstract

Self-agency is a crucial aspect of self-awareness. It is underresearched given the phenomenon's subjectivity and difficulty of study. It is particularly underresearched comparatively, given that animals cannot receive agency instructions or make agency declarations. Accordingly, we developed a distinctively new self-agency paradigm. Humans and rhesus macaques learned event categories differentiated by whether the participant's volitional response controlled a screen launch. They learned by trial and error after minimal instructions with no agency orientation (humans) or no instructions (monkeys). After learning, humans' verbalized category descriptions were coded for self-agency attributions. Across three experiments, humans' agency attributions qualitatively improved discrimination performance-participants not invoking self-agency rarely exceeded chance performance. It also produced a diagnostic latency profile: classification accuracy depended heavily on the temporal relationship between the button-press and the launch, . In our last experiment, monkeys performed the launch task. Their performance and latency profiles mirrored that of humans. Thus, self-agency can be self-discovered as a frame organizing discrimination. And it may be used as a discrimination cue by some nonhuman animals as well. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

自我能动性是自我意识的一个关键方面。考虑到该现象的主观性和研究难度,对其研究还很不足。与动物无法接受能动性指令或做出能动性声明相比,这方面的研究就更少了。因此,我们开发了一种全新的自我能动性范式。人类和恒河猴学习了通过参与者的意志反应是否控制屏幕启动来区分事件类别的任务。他们在经过最少的指令(人类)或没有指令(猴子)的试错学习后完成任务。学习后,对人类的口头类别描述进行了自我能动性归因的编码。在三个实验中,人类的能动性归因在定性上提高了区分表现——很少有不调用自我能动性的参与者能超过随机表现。它还产生了一个诊断潜伏期模式:分类准确性严重依赖于按钮按下和启动之间的时间关系。在我们的最后一个实验中,猴子执行了启动任务。它们的表现和潜伏期模式与人类相似。因此,自我能动性可以作为一种组织区分的框架被自我发现。并且它也可能被一些非人类动物用作区分线索。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
A Dissociative Framework for Understanding Same-Different Conceptualization.一个用于理解异同概念化的解离框架。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Feb;37:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
2
What Is the Sense of Agency and Why Does it Matter?何为能动感?它为何重要?
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 29;7:1272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272. eCollection 2016.
3
One Giant Leap for Categorizers: One Small Step for Categorization Theory.分类者的一大步:分类理论的一小步。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0137334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137334. eCollection 2015.
7
The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research.动物元认知研究中理论解释的高低起伏。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1297-309. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0366.
8
Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review.意图绑定与主体感:综述。
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Mar;21(1):546-61. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
9
Self-agency in rhesus monkeys.恒河猴的自我能动性。
Biol Lett. 2012 Feb 23;8(1):39-41. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0536. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验