• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非激素避孕方法的最新进展:四、自然计划生育

State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: IV. Natural family planning.

作者信息

Freundl Günter, Sivin Irving, Batár István

机构信息

Sektion Natürliche Fertilität, Universities of Düsseldorf and Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010 Apr;15(2):113-23. doi: 10.3109/13625180903545302.

DOI:10.3109/13625180903545302
PMID:20141492
Abstract

Despite the popularity of 'modern' contraceptives, natural family planning (NFP), including fertility awareness-based (FAB) methods and withdrawal, are practised in most countries. Worldwide FAB methods and withdrawal are used, respectively, by about 3.6% and 2.9% of all couples of reproductive age. This article describes the underpinnings of the different NFP methods, their rationales, histories, rules for use, efficacy and in broad categories their prevalence. Pregnancy rates of FAB methods with perfect use have ranged between 0.3 and 5.0 per 100 users per year, but typical use rates rises into the teens or higher. Withdrawal requires the male partner to be aware of his impending climax and to pull out of the vagina before ejaculation. Perfect use and typical pregnancy rates for withdrawal are estimated to be 4 and 27 per 100 per year, respectively. Many couples find NFP in accord with their own beliefs, satisfactory in its effectiveness and useful in planning a desired pregnancy. Many prize their self-control in practising NFP or withdrawal. In our research we used Medline, Popline and the Cochrane Library search engines in English, local institutional libraries, our own files in our native languages, the literature references contained therein, and source recommendations from colleagues.

摘要

尽管“现代”避孕方法很受欢迎,但包括基于生育意识的方法和体外排精在内的自然计划生育(NFP)在大多数国家都有应用。在全球范围内,所有育龄夫妇中分别约有3.6%和2.9%使用基于生育意识的方法和体外排精。本文介绍了不同自然计划生育方法的基础、原理、历史、使用规则、有效性以及大致的流行情况。完美使用基于生育意识的方法时,每年每100名使用者的怀孕率在0.3至5.0之间,但实际使用时怀孕率会升至十几或更高。体外排精要求男性伴侣意识到即将到来的高潮,并在射精前从阴道抽出。体外排精完美使用和实际使用时的怀孕率估计分别为每年每100人中有4例和27例。许多夫妇发现自然计划生育符合他们自己的信仰,在有效性方面令人满意,并且在计划想要的怀孕方面很有用。许多人珍视他们在实践自然计划生育或体外排精时的自我控制能力。在我们的研究中,我们使用了英文的Medline、Popline和Cochrane图书馆搜索引擎、当地机构图书馆、我们用母语保存的自己的文件、其中包含的文献参考以及同事提供的资料来源推荐。

相似文献

1
State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: IV. Natural family planning.非激素避孕方法的最新进展:四、自然计划生育
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010 Apr;15(2):113-23. doi: 10.3109/13625180903545302.
2
Knowledge, attitude and practice of natural family planning methods in a population with poor utilisation of modern contraceptives.现代避孕方法使用率较低人群中自然计划生育方法的知识、态度和实践
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Aug;26(6):555-60. doi: 10.1080/01443610600811482.
3
Natural family planning in the Philippines.菲律宾的自然计划生育。
Stud Fam Plann. 1984 Mar-Apr;15(2):49-61.
4
Natural family planning in 1985: a status report.1985年的自然计划生育:一份现状报告。
Popul Today. 1985 May;13(5):3, 9.
5
Natural family planning revisited.再谈自然计划生育。
Saudi Med J. 2004 Mar;25(3):285-93.
6
Natural methods of family planning.计划生育的自然方法。
Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):661-78.
7
Prospective European multi-center study of natural family planning (1989-1992): interim results. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups.欧洲自然计划生育前瞻性多中心研究(1989 - 1992年):中期结果。欧洲自然计划生育研究小组
Adv Contracept. 1993 Dec;9(4):269-83.
8
More about natural family planning.更多关于自然计划生育的内容。
Aust Fam Physician. 1983 Nov;12(11):786-92.
9
The use of traditional methods of contraception among Turkish couples.土耳其夫妇对传统避孕方法的使用。
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Mar-Apr;25(2):122-8.
10
Survey of attitudes regarding natural family planning in an urban Hispanic population.城市西班牙裔人群对自然计划生育态度的调查。
Contraception. 2006 Oct;74(4):313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.05.075. Epub 2006 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Oura Ring as a Tool for Ovulation Detection: Validation Analysis.欧若手环作为排卵检测工具:验证分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 31;27:e60667. doi: 10.2196/60667.
2
Investigating College Women's Contraceptive Choices and Sexuality.调查大学女生的避孕选择与性行为
Int J Sex Health. 2021 Apr 24;33(3):268-282. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1908477. eCollection 2021.
3
Non-Hormonal Contraception.非激素避孕法
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 20;12(14):4791. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144791.
4
Perception and use of reversible contraceptive methods in Germany: A social listening analysis.德国对可逆避孕方法的认知和使用:一项社会聆听分析。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057221147390. doi: 10.1177/17455057221147390.
5
Implementation and Scale-Up of the Standard Days Method of Family Planning: A Landscape Analysis.计划生育标准日方法的实施和推广:景观分析。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Mar 31;8(1):114-124. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00287. Print 2020 Mar 30.
6
Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app.一款避孕移动应用程序的完美使用和典型使用的珍珠指数。
Contraception. 2017 Dec;96(6):420-425. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
Improving the Knowledge and Attitude on 'Standard Days Method' of Family Planning Through a Promotional Program Among Indian Postgraduate Students.通过一项针对印度研究生的宣传项目提高其对计划生育“标准日法”的知识和态度。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017 Aug;67(4):286-290. doi: 10.1007/s13224-017-0989-0. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
8
The Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Reviewing the Literature and Building a New Concept.避孕措施的性可接受性:文献综述与新概念构建
J Sex Res. 2016 May-Jun;53(4-5):417-56. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1134425. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
9
The role of the Standard Days Method in modern family planning services in developing countries.标准日法在发展中国家现代计划生育服务中的作用。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012 Aug;17(4):254-9. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2012.677077. Epub 2012 Jun 10.